Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ITW EvercoatITW Evercoat
VS
Mercedes-Benz Careers InternationalMercedes-Benz Careers International
ITW Evercoat

ITW Evercoat

6600 Cornell Road, Cincinnati, US

Last Update: 11/02/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.evercoat.com
746/1000Moderate

Evercoat began as Fibre-Glass Evercoat in 1953. Our first formulations were developed in Cincinnati and sold throughout the US. We quickly recognized the need for quality automotive primers and fillers, and began marketing Evercoat products designed for use on automoti...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:116
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Mercedes-Benz Careers International

Mercedes-Benz Careers International

3 Temasek Avenue, #29-01 Centennial Tower, Singapore, SG, 039190

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.daimler.com/
769/1000Fair

Daimler AG is one of the biggest producers of premium cars and the world’s largest manufacturer of commercial vehicles with a global reach. The Daimler Group has divisions including Mercedes-Benz Cars, Daimler Trucks, Mercedes-Benz Vans, Daimler Buses and Daimler Financ...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:18,039
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ITW Evercoat

ITW Evercoat

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mercedes-Benz Careers International

Mercedes-Benz Careers International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ITW Evercoat in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mercedes-Benz Careers International in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ITW Evercoat (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ITW Evercoat cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mercedes-Benz Careers International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mercedes-Benz Careers International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ITW Evercoat

ITW Evercoat

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Mercedes-Benz Careers International

Mercedes-Benz Careers International

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ITW Evercoat company and Mercedes-Benz Careers International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ITW Evercoat company and Mercedes-Benz Careers International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ITW Evercoat company and Mercedes-Benz Careers International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ITW Evercoat company and Mercedes-Benz Careers International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ITW Evercoat company and Mercedes-Benz Careers International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ITW Evercoat company and Mercedes-Benz Careers International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ITW Evercoat company and Mercedes-Benz Careers International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ITW Evercoat company and Mercedes-Benz Careers International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ITW Evercoat company and Mercedes-Benz Careers International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ITW Evercoat company and Mercedes-Benz Careers International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ITW Evercoat company and Mercedes-Benz Careers International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ITW Evercoat and Mercedes-Benz Careers International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ITW Evercoat and Mercedes-Benz Careers International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ITW Evercoat or Mercedes-Benz Careers International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ITW Evercoat or Mercedes-Benz Careers International ?
Between ITW Evercoat and Mercedes-Benz Careers International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ITW Evercoat and Mercedes-Benz Careers International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1