Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics)ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics)
VS
Travis Perkins plcTravis Perkins plc
ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics)

ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics)

Cross Keys, Crawley, RH10 1HB, GB

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.itwcp.com
748/1000Moderate

ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics) is a division of ITW (Illinois Tool Works Ltd), a leading, global industrial company. At ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics) we are suppliers of innovative, engineered fastening systems and related consumables and software...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:229
Subsidiaries:31
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Travis Perkins plc

Travis Perkins plc

Ryehill House, Rye Hill Close, Northampton, NN5 7UA, GB

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
753/1000Fair

Travis Perkins plc is the UK’s largest distributor of building materials to trade customers. The breadth, reach and scale of our business means we are in a unique position to provide customers with the building materials and tools they need for their projects, when and ...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:12,742
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics)

ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Travis Perkins plc

Travis Perkins plc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Travis Perkins plc in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Travis Perkins plc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Travis Perkins plc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics)

ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Travis Perkins plc

Travis Perkins plc

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics) company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics) company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics) company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics) company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics) company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics) company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics) company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics) company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics) company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics) company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics) company and Travis Perkins plc company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics) and Travis Perkins plc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics) and Travis Perkins plc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics) or Travis Perkins plc ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics) or Travis Perkins plc ?
Between ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics) and Travis Perkins plc, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ITW Construction Products (UK & Nordics) and Travis Perkins plc, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-71194
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.2, the mDNS handler performs pool-blind lookups when resolving record queries and NOTIFY requests. When two zones with the same name exist across different pools, the lookup fails with a deterministic error, causing the handler to return REFUSED for all DNS queries through that path. The _handle_notify path is exploitable via a single unauthenticated UDP packet. This is independently reachable through the cross-tenant zone overlap described in a different recent CVE, and also affects legitimate same-tenant cross-pool configurations. BIND9 views do not mitigate this issue as mDNS is a shared service upstream of any view configuration.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-71193
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.1, zone creation checks (_is_subzone, _is_superzone, and the duplicate-zone DB constraint) are scoped to the target pool only. An authenticated user can bypass these checks by scheduling a zone to a different pool via the AttributeFilter scheduler, creating an overlapping zone that conflicts with another tenant's zone. This enables cross-tenant DNS hijack (redirecting traffic to attacker-controlled IPs) and DNS denial of service (NODATA responses). Exploitation requires a multi-pool deployment with AttributeFilter enabled in scheduler_filters, which is a non-default but documented and supported configuration for self-service tiering.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-49481
SUMMARY

UpSnap is a wake on lan web app. Versions prior to 5.4.0 have an OS command injection vulnerability in the UpSnap’s device management functionality due to the presence of unsafe shell command template interpolation using the ip and the mac fields. User-controlled values can be inserted into the wake_cmd and shutdown_cmd templates and executed via /bin/sh -c (Linux) or cmd /C (Windows) without sanitization, resulting in an authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE). A low-privileged user with permission to create or edit devices can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the UpSnap hosted server. Version 5.4.0 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-47718
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. When `secureEnabled=true`, FUXA `1.3.0-2773` still allows guest and invalid-token requests to read project, alarms, and scheduler APIs. Version 1.3.1 fixes this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47717
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. In fuxa-server version 1.3.0, the GET /api/project endpoint exposes sensitive project configuration data to guest-context requests even when secureEnabled is enabled. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9