Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ITM Logistique Alimentaire IntermarchéITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché
VS
Transnet SOC LtdTransnet SOC Ltd
ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché

ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché

13, Allée des Mousquetaires, Bondoufle, 91810, FR

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
756/1000Fair

ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché (LAI) est une branche logistique intégrée au sein du Groupement Les Mousquetaires. Notre mission englobe le Stockage, la Préparation, le Transport et la Livraison de toutes les marchandises disponibles dans plus de 2 650 points de...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:1,128
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Transnet SOC Ltd

Transnet SOC Ltd

138 Eloff Street, Johannesburg, 2001, ZA

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.transnet.net
700/1000Moderate

As the custodian of ports, rail and pipelines, Transnet’s objective is to ensure a globally competitive freight system that enables sustained growth and diversification of the country’s economy. As a state-owned company, Transnet continues to leave an indelible mark ...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:27,935
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché

ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Transnet SOC Ltd

Transnet SOC Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

Transnet SOC Ltd has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Transnet SOC Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transnet SOC Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché

ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Transnet SOC Ltd

Transnet SOC Ltd

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TRA1788503263
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TRA603092125

FAQ

Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché and Transnet SOC Ltd, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché and Transnet SOC Ltd, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché or Transnet SOC Ltd ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché or Transnet SOC Ltd ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché and Transnet SOC Ltd, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché and Transnet SOC Ltd, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9