Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ITM Logistique Alimentaire IntermarchéITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché
VS
PostNordPostNord
ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché

ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché

13, Allée des Mousquetaires, Bondoufle, 91810, FR

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
756/1000Fair

ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché (LAI) est une branche logistique intégrée au sein du Groupement Les Mousquetaires. Notre mission englobe le Stockage, la Préparation, le Transport et la Livraison de toutes les marchandises disponibles dans plus de 2 650 points de...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:1,128
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
PostNord

PostNord

Terminalvägen 24, Solna, SE, 17173

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
769/1000Fair

We make everyday life easier. PostNord is a leading provider of parcel and logistics services to, from, and within the Nordic region. We ensure the provision of a postal service to households and businesses in Sweden, regardless of where they live and work. PostNord c...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:13,860
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché

ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PostNord

PostNord

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PostNord in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PostNord (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PostNord cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché

ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
PostNord

PostNord

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché company and PostNord company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché company and PostNord company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché company and PostNord company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché company and PostNord company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché company and PostNord company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché company and PostNord company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché company and PostNord company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché company and PostNord company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché company and PostNord company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché company and PostNord company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché company and PostNord company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché and PostNord, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché and PostNord, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché or PostNord ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché or PostNord ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché and PostNord, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ITM Logistique Alimentaire Intermarché and PostNord, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2