Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

IterableIterable
VS
CiscoCisco
Iterable

Iterable

201 Spear St, San Francisco, 94105, US

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://iterable.com
757/1000Fair

Iterable is the AI customer engagement platform built for enterprise scale, loved by teams, and trusted by global brands like Priceline, Fabletics, Blockchain, and Box. It transforms data into action, powering intelligent, personalized experiences across every channel t...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:876
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Cisco

Cisco

Tasman Way, San Jose, 95134, US

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.cisco.com
161/1000Critical

Cisco is the worldwide technology leader that is revolutionizing the way organizations connect and protect in the AI era. For more than 40 years, Cisco has securely connected the world. With its industry leading AI-powered solutions and services, Cisco enables its custo...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:95,930
Subsidiaries:29
12-month incidents
34
Known data breaches
10
Attack type number
5

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Iterable

Iterable

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Cisco

Cisco

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Iterable has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Cisco has 3200.97% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Iterable (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Iterable cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Cisco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cisco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Iterable

Iterable

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAN1787835222
Cisco

Cisco

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CIS1789446229
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ADO1788668623
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CIS1787228649

FAQ

Between Iterable company and Cisco company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Iterable company and Cisco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Iterable company and Cisco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Iterable company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Iterable company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Iterable company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Iterable company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Iterable company and Cisco company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Iterable company and Cisco company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Iterable company and Cisco company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Iterable company and Cisco company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Iterable and Cisco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Iterable and Cisco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Iterable or Cisco ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Iterable or Cisco ?
Between Iterable and Cisco, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Iterable and Cisco, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3