Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Institute of Technical EducationInstitute of Technical Education
VS
University of California, San FranciscoUniversity of California, San Francisco
Institute of Technical Education

Institute of Technical Education

2 Ang Mo Kio Drive, Singapore, Singapore, 567720, SG

Last Update: 13/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ite.edu.sg
780/1000Fair

The Institute of Technical Education (ITE) was established as a post-secondary institution in 1992, under the Ministry of Education. ITE is a principal provider of career and technical education and a key developer of national skills certification and standards skilling...

NAICS:611
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:2,375
Subsidiaries:30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
University of California, San Francisco

University of California, San Francisco

530 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, California, US, 94122

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.ucsf.edu
688/1000Weak

UC San Francisco is driven by the idea that when the best research, the best education and the best patient care converge, great breakthroughs are achieved. We pursue this integrated excellence with singular focus, fueled by collaboration among our top-ranked profession...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:21,346
Subsidiaries:57
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Institute of Technical Education

Institute of Technical Education

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of California, San Francisco

University of California, San Francisco

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Institute of Technical Education in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of California, San Francisco in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Institute of Technical Education (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Institute of Technical Education cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of California, San Francisco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of California, San Francisco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Institute of Technical Education

Institute of Technical Education

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
University of California, San Francisco

University of California, San Francisco

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UCS000122224

FAQ

Between Institute of Technical Education company and University of California, San Francisco company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Institute of Technical Education company and University of California, San Francisco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Institute of Technical Education company and University of California, San Francisco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Institute of Technical Education company and University of California, San Francisco company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Institute of Technical Education company and University of California, San Francisco company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Institute of Technical Education company and University of California, San Francisco company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Institute of Technical Education company and University of California, San Francisco company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Institute of Technical Education company and University of California, San Francisco company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Institute of Technical Education company and University of California, San Francisco company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Institute of Technical Education company and University of California, San Francisco company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Institute of Technical Education company and University of California, San Francisco company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Institute of Technical Education and University of California, San Francisco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Institute of Technical Education and University of California, San Francisco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Institute of Technical Education or University of California, San Francisco ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Institute of Technical Education or University of California, San Francisco ?
Between Institute of Technical Education and University of California, San Francisco, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Institute of Technical Education and University of California, San Francisco, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8