Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

IT.NiedersachsenIT.Niedersachsen
VS
CONICETCONICET
IT.Niedersachsen

IT.Niedersachsen

Göttinger Chaussee 259, Hannover, 30459, DE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
762/1000Fair

Wir von IT.Niedersachsen verbinden das Land und seine Leute. Denn wir stellen sicher, dass die Beschäftigten in der öffentlichen Verwaltung digital arbeiten können. Und wir sorgen dafür, dass Bürgerinnen und Bürger in Zukunft alle Ämter, Behörden und Ministerien online ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:302
Subsidiaries:35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
CONICET

CONICET

Godoy Cruz 2290, CABA, C1425FQB, AR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.conicet.gov.ar
782/1000Fair

El Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) es el principal organismo dedicado a la promoción de la ciencia y la tecnología en la Argentina. Su actividad se desarrolla en cuatro grandes áreas: • Ciencias agrarias, ingeniería y de materiales •...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:13,752
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
IT.Niedersachsen

IT.Niedersachsen

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CONICET

CONICET

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IT.Niedersachsen in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CONICET in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - IT.Niedersachsen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IT.Niedersachsen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CONICET (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CONICET cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
IT.Niedersachsen

IT.Niedersachsen

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
CONICET

CONICET

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between IT.Niedersachsen company and CONICET company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between IT.Niedersachsen company and CONICET company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between IT.Niedersachsen company and CONICET company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between IT.Niedersachsen company and CONICET company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between IT.Niedersachsen company and CONICET company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between IT.Niedersachsen company and CONICET company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between IT.Niedersachsen company and CONICET company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between IT.Niedersachsen company and CONICET company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between IT.Niedersachsen company and CONICET company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between IT.Niedersachsen company and CONICET company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between IT.Niedersachsen company and CONICET company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between IT.Niedersachsen and CONICET, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between IT.Niedersachsen and CONICET, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - IT.Niedersachsen or CONICET ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - IT.Niedersachsen or CONICET ?
Between IT.Niedersachsen and CONICET, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between IT.Niedersachsen and CONICET, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9