Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ISS SwedenISS Sweden
VS
CintasCintas
ISS Sweden

ISS Sweden

Årstaängsvägen 21b, Stockholm, 11743, SE

Last Update: 25/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.issworld.se
764/1000Fair

ISS är ett ledande företag inom facility management och workplace experience. Vi skapar platser och miljöer som bidrar till bättre prestationer och en enklare, mer effektiv och trivsam tillvaro - levererade med omtanke och hög kvalitet av engagerade medarbetare.

NAICS:5612
NAICS Definition:Facilities Support Services
Employees:1,329
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Cintas

Cintas

6800 Cintas Blvd, Mason, 45040, US

Last Update: 05/06/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.cintas.com
824/1000Good

Cintas Corporation, a Fortune 500 company headquartered in Cincinnati, specializes in helping businesses of all sizes get Ready™ for the Workday®. We provide a comprehensive range of products and services, including uniforms, mats, mops, towels, restroom supplies, workp...

NAICS:5612
NAICS Definition:Facilities Support Services
Employees:29,820
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ISS Sweden

ISS Sweden

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Cintas

Cintas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ISS Sweden in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cintas in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ISS Sweden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ISS Sweden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Cintas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cintas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ISS Sweden

ISS Sweden

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Cintas

Cintas

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ISS Sweden company and Cintas company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ISS Sweden company and Cintas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ISS Sweden company and Cintas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ISS Sweden company and Cintas company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ISS Sweden company and Cintas company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ISS Sweden company and Cintas company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ISS Sweden company and Cintas company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ISS Sweden company and Cintas company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ISS Sweden company and Cintas company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ISS Sweden company and Cintas company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ISS Sweden company and Cintas company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ISS Sweden and Cintas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ISS Sweden and Cintas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ISS Sweden or Cintas ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ISS Sweden or Cintas ?
Between ISS Sweden and Cintas, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ISS Sweden and Cintas, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57100
SUMMARY

Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Entra Provisioning Service (SyncFabric) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-54998
SUMMARY

Incorrect authorization in Microsoft Exchange Online allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-45499
SUMMARY

Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure OpenAI allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-41106
SUMMARY

Url redirection to untrusted site ('open redirect') in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-26145
SUMMARY

Improper access control in Azure Synapse allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2