Comparison Overview

Israel Defense Forces

VS

US Army

Israel Defense Forces

1 HaKirya, Tel Aviv, 6473209, IL
Last Update: 2026-01-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.idf.il/en

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) is the military of the State of Israel, responsible for the nation's defense and security. Founded in 1948, the IDF ranks among the most battle-tested armed forces in the world, having had to defend the country in six major wars. At the age of 18, men and women are required to do mandatory military service in one of the IDF's three branches - Ground Forces, Air Force, and Navy. The Israel Defense Forces is unique in its inclusion of mandatory conscription of women. Men and women of all ranks serve side by side in various positions such as pilots, captains, combat soldiers, intelligence, doctors, technicians and much more. This national service brings together Israelis from all sectors of society, religions and backgrounds. The IDF is considered to be one of the world's most technologically-advanced militaries and contributes greatly to Israel's thriving culture of tech start-ups and cutting-edge innovation.

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 11,813
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

US Army

1500 Army Navy Dr, Arlington, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 800 and 849
https://www.army.mil

Welcome to the official U.S. Army LinkedIn page. The U.S. Army’s mission is to fight and win our Nation’s wars by providing prompt, sustained land dominance across the full range of military operations and spectrum of conflict in support of combatant commanders. If you're looking for news about the U.S. Army, visit http://www.army.mil/ For information about U.S. Army career opportunities https://www.goarmy.com/?iom=BNL7-22-0029_N_OSOC_OCPA_LI_ocpagen_xx_xx.

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 355,851
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/israeldefenseforces.jpeg
Israel Defense Forces
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-army.jpeg
US Army
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Israel Defense Forces
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
US Army
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Israel Defense Forces in 2026.

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for US Army in 2026.

Incident History — Israel Defense Forces (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Israel Defense Forces cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — US Army (X = Date, Y = Severity)

US Army cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/israeldefenseforces.jpeg
Israel Defense Forces
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-army.jpeg
US Army
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 07/2018
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Basic Security Vulnerability
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2015
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Website Hacking
Motivation: Political
Blog: Blog

FAQ

US Army company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Israel Defense Forces company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

US Army company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Israel Defense Forces company has not reported any.

In the current year, US Army company and Israel Defense Forces company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither US Army company nor Israel Defense Forces company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

US Army company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Israel Defense Forces company has not reported such incidents publicly.

US Army company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Israel Defense Forces company has not reported such incidents publicly.

US Army company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Israel Defense Forces company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Israel Defense Forces nor US Army holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

US Army company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Israel Defense Forces company.

US Army company employs more people globally than Israel Defense Forces company, reflecting its scale as a Armed Forces.

Neither Israel Defense Forces nor US Army holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Israel Defense Forces nor US Army holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Israel Defense Forces nor US Army holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Israel Defense Forces nor US Army holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Israel Defense Forces nor US Army holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Israel Defense Forces nor US Army holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References