Comparison Overview

Israel Defense Forces

VS

United States Marine Corps

Israel Defense Forces

1 HaKirya, Tel Aviv, 6473209, IL
Last Update: 2026-03-29
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.idf.il/en

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) is the military of the State of Israel, responsible for the nation's defense and security. Founded in 1948, the IDF ranks among the most battle-tested armed forces in the world, having had to defend the country in six major wars. At the age of 18, men and women are required to do mandatory military service in one of the IDF's three branches - Ground Forces, Air Force, and Navy. The Israel Defense Forces is unique in its inclusion of mandatory conscription of women. Men and women of all ranks serve side by side in various positions such as pilots, captains, combat soldiers, intelligence, doctors, technicians and much more. This national service brings together Israelis from all sectors of society, religions and backgrounds. The IDF is considered to be one of the world's most technologically-advanced militaries and contributes greatly to Israel's thriving culture of tech start-ups and cutting-edge innovation.

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 11,813
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

United States Marine Corps

3000 Marine Corps Pentagon, Washington, 20350, US
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 750 and 799
http://www.marines.mil/

The United States Marine Corps (USMC) is a branch of the United States Armed Forces responsible for providing power projection, using the mobility of the United States Navy, by Congressional mandate, to deliver rapidly, combined-arms task forces on land, at sea, and in the air. The U.S. Marine Corps is one of the four armed service branches in the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and one of the seven uniformed services of the United States.

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 74,252
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/israeldefenseforces.jpeg
Israel Defense Forces
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marines.jpeg
United States Marine Corps
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Israel Defense Forces
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
United States Marine Corps
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

Israel Defense Forces has 64.29% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United States Marine Corps in 2026.

Incident History — Israel Defense Forces (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Israel Defense Forces cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — United States Marine Corps (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United States Marine Corps cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/israeldefenseforces.jpeg
Israel Defense Forces
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2026
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Airstrike (Kinetic Attack)
Motivation: Retaliation / Strategic Disruption
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marines.jpeg
United States Marine Corps
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

United States Marine Corps company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Israel Defense Forces company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Israel Defense Forces company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas United States Marine Corps company has not reported any.

In the current year, Israel Defense Forces company has reported more cyber incidents than United States Marine Corps company.

Neither United States Marine Corps company nor Israel Defense Forces company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither United States Marine Corps company nor Israel Defense Forces company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Israel Defense Forces company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while United States Marine Corps company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Israel Defense Forces company nor United States Marine Corps company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Israel Defense Forces nor United States Marine Corps holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Israel Defense Forces company nor United States Marine Corps company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

United States Marine Corps company employs more people globally than Israel Defense Forces company, reflecting its scale as a Armed Forces.

Neither Israel Defense Forces nor United States Marine Corps holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Israel Defense Forces nor United States Marine Corps holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Israel Defense Forces nor United States Marine Corps holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Israel Defense Forces nor United States Marine Corps holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Israel Defense Forces nor United States Marine Corps holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Israel Defense Forces nor United States Marine Corps holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References