Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ISC Security EventsISC Security Events
VS
Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e ServiçosGocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços
ISC Security Events

ISC Security Events

401 Merritt 7, Norwalk, 06851, US

Last Update: 26/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.discoverisc.com
756/1000Fair

International Security Conference & Exposition (ISC) security events are the leading exhibitions for the security tradeshow industry. ISC Security Events are the only holistic security tradeshows strategically designed to provide products, technology, education & networ...

NAICS:5616
NAICS Definition:Investigation and Security Services
Employees:21
Subsidiaries:78
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços

Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços

Avenida Professor Francisco Morato 525, São Paulo, 05513-000, BR

Last Update: 21/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://gocil.com.br
782/1000Fair

One of the largest companies in the professional services and security markets in Brazil. Formed by four branches, patrimonial security, personal security, electronic security and general services. Counting with around 16.000 employees, Gocil is present at several brazi...

NAICS:5616
NAICS Definition:Investigation and Security Services
Employees:10,859
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ISC Security Events

ISC Security Events

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços

Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ISC Security Events in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ISC Security Events (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ISC Security Events cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ISC Security Events

ISC Security Events

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços

Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ISC Security Events company and Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ISC Security Events company and Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ISC Security Events company and Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ISC Security Events company and Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ISC Security Events company and Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ISC Security Events company and Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ISC Security Events company and Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ISC Security Events company and Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ISC Security Events company and Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ISC Security Events company and Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ISC Security Events company and Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ISC Security Events and Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ISC Security Events and Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ISC Security Events or Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ISC Security Events or Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços ?
Between ISC Security Events and Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ISC Security Events and Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3