Comparison Overview
Iron Mountain Asset Lifecycle Management

Iron Mountain Asset Lifecycle Management
N/A
Last Update: 31/03/2026
For over 70 years, Iron Mountain Incorporated (NYSE: IRM) has been your strategic partner to care for your information and assets. Our Asset Lifecycle Management division delivers a strategic approach to IT asset management that protects data, ensures optimized use, max...

Sopra Steria
9 rue de Presbourg, Paris, 75016, FR
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Sopra Steria, a major Tech player in Europe with 51,000 employees in nearly 30 countries, is recognised for its consulting, digital services and solutions. It helps its clients drive their digital transformation and obtain tangible and sustainable benefits. The Group pr...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Iron Mountain Asset Lifecycle Management







Sopra Steria






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Iron Mountain Asset Lifecycle Management in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sopra Steria in 2026.
Incident History - Iron Mountain Asset Lifecycle Management (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Iron Mountain Asset Lifecycle Management cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Sopra Steria (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sopra Steria cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Iron Mountain Asset Lifecycle Management

Sopra Steria
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.