Comparison Overview
Information Risk Management (IRM)

Information Risk Management (IRM)
Eagle Tower, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, Gl50 1TA, GB
Last Update: 09/03/2026
IRM, part of the Capgemini Group, works to defend organisations against cyber threats. Founded in 1998, IRM provides visibility and control across entire cyber landscapes by combining more than two decades of consultancy with advanced technology. By covering all aspect...

Palo Alto Networks
3000 Tannery Way, SANTA CLARA, 95054, US
Last Update: 02/07/2026
Palo Alto Networks, the global cybersecurity leader, is shaping the cloud-centric future with technology that is transforming the way people and organizations operate. Our mission is to be the cybersecurity partner of choice, protecting our digital way of life. We help ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Information Risk Management (IRM)







Palo Alto Networks






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Information Risk Management (IRM) in 2026.
Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)
Palo Alto Networks has 566.67% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Information Risk Management (IRM) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Information Risk Management (IRM) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Palo Alto Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Palo Alto Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Information Risk Management (IRM)

Palo Alto Networks
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.