Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیروMinistry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو
VS
PT Pertamina (Persero)PT Pertamina (Persero)
Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو

Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو

Kordestan - Niayesh Cross Expy,, Tehran, 1996832611, IR

Last Update: 06/05/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.moe.gov.ir/
696/1000Weak

Ministry of Energy, is the main organ of the Government in charge of the regulation and implementation of policies applicable to energy, electricity, water and wastewater services. -The ministry consists of five deputies as follows: Deputy for Research and Human Resour...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:187
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
PT Pertamina (Persero)

PT Pertamina (Persero)

Jl. Medan Merdeka Timur No. 11-13, Jakarta Pusat, 10110, ID

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://pertamina.com/
774/1000Fair

PT Pertamina (Persero) is an Indonesian state-owned enterprise, which is engaged in the integrated energy in Indonesia. Established on December 10, 1957, Pertamina had the experiences in upstream, midstream, downstream and renewable energy sectors for more than 50 years...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:81,187
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو

Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PT Pertamina (Persero)

PT Pertamina (Persero)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو has 16.67% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT Pertamina (Persero) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PT Pertamina (Persero) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT Pertamina (Persero) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو

Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BAD1772389516
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
IRA1778078883
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
IRA1767601584
PT Pertamina (Persero)

PT Pertamina (Persero)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
PER536092125

FAQ

Between Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو company and PT Pertamina (Persero) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو company and PT Pertamina (Persero) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو company and PT Pertamina (Persero) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو company and PT Pertamina (Persero) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو company and PT Pertamina (Persero) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو company and PT Pertamina (Persero) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو company and PT Pertamina (Persero) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو company and PT Pertamina (Persero) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو company and PT Pertamina (Persero) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو company and PT Pertamina (Persero) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو company and PT Pertamina (Persero) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو and PT Pertamina (Persero), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو and PT Pertamina (Persero), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو or PT Pertamina (Persero) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو or PT Pertamina (Persero) ?
Between Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو and PT Pertamina (Persero), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ministry of Energy of I.R.IRAN - وزارت نیرو and PT Pertamina (Persero), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2