Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by CytometryiQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry
VS
RegeneronRegeneron
iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry

iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry

3874 Research Park Dr, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48108, US

Last Update: 06/12/2025

View Profile

Scientists use flow cytometry to investigate complex biological processes as part of routine cell analysis workflows. This research has a significant impact on society as it drives progress in antibody discovery, T-cell engineering, immuno-oncology, and more. To keep pa...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:13
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Regeneron

Regeneron

777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, 10591, US

Last Update: 21/06/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.regeneron.com
818/1000Good

At Regeneron we believe that when the right idea finds the right team, powerful change is possible. As we work across our expanding global network to invent, develop and commercialize life-transforming medicines for people with serious diseases, we’re establishing new w...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:16,502
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry

iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Regeneron

Regeneron

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Biotechnology Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Biotechnology Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Regeneron in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry (X = Date, Y = Severity)

iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Regeneron (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Regeneron cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry

iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Regeneron

Regeneron

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry company and Regeneron company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry company and Regeneron company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry company and Regeneron company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry company and Regeneron company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry company and Regeneron company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry company and Regeneron company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry company and Regeneron company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry company and Regeneron company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry company and Regeneron company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry company and Regeneron company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry company and Regeneron company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry and Regeneron, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry and Regeneron, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry or Regeneron ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry or Regeneron ?
Between iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry and Regeneron, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between iQue® High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by Cytometry and Regeneron, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2