Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

IQA ElecnorIQA Elecnor
VS
Eskom Holdings SOC LtdEskom Holdings SOC Ltd
IQA Elecnor

IQA Elecnor

2 centura court Nasmyth place Hillington, Glasgow, G52 4PR, GB

Last Update: 29/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.IQAgroup.co.uk
755/1000Fair

IQA lead the way in designing, building, maintaining, and upgrading electrical utility networks, telecommunication networks, EVCP and electrical infrastructure for both the public and private sector and for distribution network operators. We provide tailor-made soluti...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:214
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd

Maxwell Drive, Sunninghill , Johannesburg, 2191, ZA

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eskom.co.za
798/1000Fair

Company profile Eskom Holdings generates, transports and distributes approximately 95% of South Africa’s electricity – making up 60% of the total electricity consumed on the African continent. Eskom is the world’s eleventh-largest power utility in terms of generating...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:42,212
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
IQA Elecnor

IQA Elecnor

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IQA Elecnor in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - IQA Elecnor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IQA Elecnor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
IQA Elecnor

IQA Elecnor

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ESK238221222

FAQ

Between IQA Elecnor company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between IQA Elecnor company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between IQA Elecnor company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between IQA Elecnor company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between IQA Elecnor company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between IQA Elecnor company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between IQA Elecnor company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between IQA Elecnor company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between IQA Elecnor company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between IQA Elecnor company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between IQA Elecnor company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between IQA Elecnor and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between IQA Elecnor and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - IQA Elecnor or Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - IQA Elecnor or Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd ?
Between IQA Elecnor and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between IQA Elecnor and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8