Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

IQ SolutionsIQ Solutions
VS
International Mission of Mercy (IMM)International Mission of Mercy (IMM)
IQ Solutions

IQ Solutions

6116 Executive Blvd, North Bethesda, 20852, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://iqsolutions.com
650/1000Weak

Thirty years ago, IQ Solutions was built on a vision, a mission, and a framework of values that continue to ignite us daily. We apply strategic communications, science and evidence-based research, public health theory, and innovation to our blend of content and technica...

NAICS:54182
NAICS Definition:Public Relations Agencies
Employees:268
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
International Mission of Mercy (IMM)

International Mission of Mercy (IMM)

N/A

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.immusa.org/
841/1000Good

International Mission of Mercy (IMM) was founded in 1991 by Satish Mehtani, a veteran of disaster relief missions in Kuwait, Japan and at the World Trade Center following September 11, 2001. IMM is a certified 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization whose goals are to s...

NAICS:54182
NAICS Definition:Public Relations Agencies
Employees:22,339
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
IQ Solutions

IQ Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
International Mission of Mercy (IMM)

International Mission of Mercy (IMM)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Relations and Communications Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IQ Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Public Relations and Communications Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Mission of Mercy (IMM) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - IQ Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IQ Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - International Mission of Mercy (IMM) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Mission of Mercy (IMM) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
IQ Solutions

IQ Solutions

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
IQ-1764897582
International Mission of Mercy (IMM)

International Mission of Mercy (IMM)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between IQ Solutions company and International Mission of Mercy (IMM) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between IQ Solutions company and International Mission of Mercy (IMM) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between IQ Solutions company and International Mission of Mercy (IMM) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between IQ Solutions company and International Mission of Mercy (IMM) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between IQ Solutions company and International Mission of Mercy (IMM) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between IQ Solutions company and International Mission of Mercy (IMM) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between IQ Solutions company and International Mission of Mercy (IMM) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between IQ Solutions company and International Mission of Mercy (IMM) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between IQ Solutions company and International Mission of Mercy (IMM) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between IQ Solutions company and International Mission of Mercy (IMM) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between IQ Solutions company and International Mission of Mercy (IMM) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between IQ Solutions and International Mission of Mercy (IMM), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between IQ Solutions and International Mission of Mercy (IMM), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - IQ Solutions or International Mission of Mercy (IMM) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - IQ Solutions or International Mission of Mercy (IMM) ?
Between IQ Solutions and International Mission of Mercy (IMM), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between IQ Solutions and International Mission of Mercy (IMM), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1