Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

iptiQ by Swiss ReiptiQ by Swiss Re
VS
LocktonLockton
iptiQ by Swiss Re

iptiQ by Swiss Re

50/60 Mythenquai, Zurich, 8022, CH

Last Update: 14/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.iptiq.com
754/1000Fair

We're a digital B2B2C insurance company powered by Swiss Re, one of the world’s leading providers of re/insurance and risk transfer solutions. At iptiQ, we're unlocking insurance to drive business growth and customer value for our partners around the world. By offering ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:379
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Lockton

Lockton

Global, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.lockton.com
748/1000Moderate

What makes Lockton stand apart is also what makes us better: independence. Our private ownership empowers our 13,100+ Associates doing business in over 140+ countries to focus solely on clients' risk and insurance needs. With expertise that reaches around the globe, we ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:14,245
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
iptiQ by Swiss Re

iptiQ by Swiss Re

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lockton

Lockton

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for iptiQ by Swiss Re in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lockton in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - iptiQ by Swiss Re (X = Date, Y = Severity)

iptiQ by Swiss Re cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lockton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lockton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
iptiQ by Swiss Re

iptiQ by Swiss Re

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Lockton

Lockton

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LOC531072525

FAQ

Between iptiQ by Swiss Re company and Lockton company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between iptiQ by Swiss Re company and Lockton company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between iptiQ by Swiss Re company and Lockton company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between iptiQ by Swiss Re company and Lockton company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between iptiQ by Swiss Re company and Lockton company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between iptiQ by Swiss Re company and Lockton company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between iptiQ by Swiss Re company and Lockton company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between iptiQ by Swiss Re company and Lockton company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between iptiQ by Swiss Re company and Lockton company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between iptiQ by Swiss Re company and Lockton company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between iptiQ by Swiss Re company and Lockton company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between iptiQ by Swiss Re and Lockton, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between iptiQ by Swiss Re and Lockton, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - iptiQ by Swiss Re or Lockton ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - iptiQ by Swiss Re or Lockton ?
Between iptiQ by Swiss Re and Lockton, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between iptiQ by Swiss Re and Lockton, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA