Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

IPM- International Project ManagementIPM- International Project Management
VS
AlmavivA ExperienceAlmavivA Experience
IPM- International Project Management

IPM- International Project Management

Cra 11 B No 98-08 Of. 301, Bogotá, 04, CO

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ipmconsulting.net
751/1000Fair

Who we are Provide Consulting and Project Management services of high-level, optimizing the growth of our clients business by implementing strategies that provide short term results of quality and anticipating to the market trends. Our portafolio of services inclu...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:131
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AlmavivA Experience

AlmavivA Experience

Avenida Rebouças 2728, São Paulo, 05402-500, BR

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
778/1000Fair

Líder em transformação digital nos mercados de Customer Experience e Debt Collection na América Latina. Combinamos tecnologia, inteligência e excelência operacional para entregar soluções completas que antecipam as necessidades dos nossos Clientes. São mais de 530 mil...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:22,366
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
IPM- International Project Management

IPM- International Project Management

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AlmavivA Experience

AlmavivA Experience

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IPM- International Project Management in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AlmavivA Experience in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - IPM- International Project Management (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IPM- International Project Management cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AlmavivA Experience (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AlmavivA Experience cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
IPM- International Project Management

IPM- International Project Management

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AlmavivA Experience

AlmavivA Experience

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between IPM- International Project Management company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between IPM- International Project Management company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between IPM- International Project Management company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between IPM- International Project Management company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between IPM- International Project Management company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between IPM- International Project Management company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between IPM- International Project Management company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between IPM- International Project Management company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between IPM- International Project Management company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between IPM- International Project Management company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between IPM- International Project Management company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between IPM- International Project Management and AlmavivA Experience, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between IPM- International Project Management and AlmavivA Experience, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - IPM- International Project Management or AlmavivA Experience ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - IPM- International Project Management or AlmavivA Experience ?
Between IPM- International Project Management and AlmavivA Experience, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between IPM- International Project Management and AlmavivA Experience, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2