Comparison Overview
IPG Mediabrands Latam

IPG Mediabrands Latam
800 Waterford Way, Miami, Florida, 33126, US
Last Update: 02/02/2026
IPG Mediabrands es la división de soluciones de marketing y medios de Interpublic Group (NYSE: IPG). IPG Mediabrands administra aproximadamente $40 mil millones en inversiones de marketing a nivel mundial en nombre de sus clientes a través de sus agencias full-service...

Clinic
20-24 Broadwick St, London, W1F 8HT, GB
Last Update: 29/03/2026
Clinic is an independent creative agency. We create bold ideas, and craft them beautifully, to get people thinking, believing and doing. All of our experience goes into what we do today, and although our world’s constantly changing, the endpoint is still people a...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

IPG Mediabrands Latam







Clinic






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for IPG Mediabrands Latam in 2026.
Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Clinic in 2026.
Incident History - IPG Mediabrands Latam (X = Date, Y = Severity)
IPG Mediabrands Latam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Clinic (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Clinic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

IPG Mediabrands Latam

Clinic
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.