Comparison Overview

Interpublic Group (IPG)

VS

TBWA\Worldwide

Interpublic Group (IPG)

909 Third Avenue, New York, NY, 10022, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Interpublic (NYSE: IPG) is a values-based, data-fueled, and creatively-driven provider of marketing solutions. Home to some of the world’s best-known and most innovative communications specialists, IPG global brands include Acxiom, Craft, FCB, FutureBrand, Golin, Initiative, IPG Health, IPG Mediabrands, Jack Morton, KINESSO, MAGNA, McCann, Mediahub, Momentum, MRM, MullenLowe Global, Octagon, UM, Weber Shandwick and more. IPG is an S&P 500 company with total revenue of $10.7 billion in 2024.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 15,245
Subsidiaries: 36
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TBWA\Worldwide

220 E 42nd St, New York, NY, US, 10017
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

TBWA is The Disruption Company®. We are a Collective of creative minds with an unlimited creative canvas. We create brand platforms that defy convention and compete with culture. Thanks to our trademarked Disruption® methodology, we build the world’s strongest brands. Brands that own an unfair share of the future. Named one of the World's Most Innovative Companies by Fast Company in 2025, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020 and 2019, TBWA is also Adweek's 2024, 2022, 2021 and 2018 Global Agency of the Year and AdAge’s A-List 2022 Network of the Year. Our Collective has 11,000+ creative minds in over 40 countries, and also includes brands such as Auditoire, Digital Arts Network (DAN), eg+ worldwide, GMR, TBWA\Media Arts Lab, TBWA\Health Collective and TRO. Global clients include adidas, Apple, Gatorade, Henkel, Hilton Hotels, McDonald's, Nissan and Singapore Airlines. TBWA is part of Omnicom Group (NYSE: OMC).

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 10,608
Subsidiaries: 72
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ipg.jpeg
Interpublic Group (IPG)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tbwa.jpeg
TBWA\Worldwide
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Interpublic Group (IPG)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TBWA\Worldwide
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Interpublic Group (IPG) in 2025.

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TBWA\Worldwide in 2025.

Incident History — Interpublic Group (IPG) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Interpublic Group (IPG) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TBWA\Worldwide (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TBWA\Worldwide cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ipg.jpeg
Interpublic Group (IPG)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tbwa.jpeg
TBWA\Worldwide
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Bluetooth Protocol
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Interpublic Group (IPG) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TBWA\Worldwide company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

TBWA\Worldwide company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Interpublic Group (IPG) company has not reported any.

In the current year, TBWA\Worldwide company has reported more cyber incidents than Interpublic Group (IPG) company.

Neither TBWA\Worldwide company nor Interpublic Group (IPG) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TBWA\Worldwide company nor Interpublic Group (IPG) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TBWA\Worldwide company nor Interpublic Group (IPG) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

TBWA\Worldwide company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Interpublic Group (IPG) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) nor TBWA\Worldwide holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

TBWA\Worldwide company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Interpublic Group (IPG) company.

Interpublic Group (IPG) company employs more people globally than TBWA\Worldwide company, reflecting its scale as a Advertising Services.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) nor TBWA\Worldwide holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) nor TBWA\Worldwide holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) nor TBWA\Worldwide holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) nor TBWA\Worldwide holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) nor TBWA\Worldwide holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) nor TBWA\Worldwide holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N