Comparison Overview

Interpublic Group (IPG)

VS

Quad

Interpublic Group (IPG)

909 Third Avenue, New York, NY, 10022, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.interpublic.com

Interpublic (NYSE: IPG) is a values-based, data-fueled, and creatively-driven provider of marketing solutions. Home to some of the world’s best-known and most innovative communications specialists, IPG global brands include Acxiom, Craft, FCB, FutureBrand, Golin, Initiative, IPG Health, IPG Mediabrands, Jack Morton, KINESSO, MAGNA, McCann, Mediahub, Momentum, MRM, MullenLowe Global, Octagon, UM, Weber Shandwick and more. IPG is an S&P 500 company with total revenue of $10.7 billion in 2024.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 15,245
Subsidiaries: 36
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Quad

Sussex, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 700 and 749
http://www.quad.com

Quad (NYSE: QUAD) is a global marketing experience company that helps brands make direct consumer connections, from household to in-store to online. Supported by state-of-the-art technology and data-driven intelligence, Quad uses its suite of media, creative and production solutions to streamline the complexities of marketing and remove friction from wherever it occurs in the marketing journey. Quad tailors its uniquely flexible, scalable and connected solutions to clients’ objectives, driving cost efficiencies, improving speed to market, strengthening marketing effectiveness, and delivering value on client investments. Quad employs approximately 13,000 people in 14 countries and serves approximately 2,700 clients including industry leading blue-chip companies that serve both businesses and consumers in multiple industry verticals, with a particular focus on commerce, including retail, consumer packaged goods, and direct-to-consumer; financial services; and health. Quad is ranked as the 14th largest agency company in the U.S. by Ad Age (2023), and the second-largest commercial printer in North America, according to Printing Impressions (2023). For more information about Quad, including its commitment to ongoing innovation, culture and sustainable impact, visit quad.com.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 10,232
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ipg.jpeg
Interpublic Group (IPG)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quadgraphics.jpeg
Quad
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Interpublic Group (IPG)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Quad
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Interpublic Group (IPG) in 2025.

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Quad in 2025.

Incident History — Interpublic Group (IPG) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Interpublic Group (IPG) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Quad (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quad cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ipg.jpeg
Interpublic Group (IPG)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quadgraphics.jpeg
Quad
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Interpublic Group (IPG) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Quad company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Quad company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Interpublic Group (IPG) company.

In the current year, Quad company and Interpublic Group (IPG) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Quad company nor Interpublic Group (IPG) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Quad company nor Interpublic Group (IPG) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Quad company nor Interpublic Group (IPG) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) company nor Quad company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) nor Quad holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Interpublic Group (IPG) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Quad company.

Interpublic Group (IPG) company employs more people globally than Quad company, reflecting its scale as a Advertising Services.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) nor Quad holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) nor Quad holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) nor Quad holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) nor Quad holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) nor Quad holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) nor Quad holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References