Comparison Overview

Interpublic Group (IPG)

VS

Clinic

Interpublic Group (IPG)

909 Third Avenue, New York, NY, 10022, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.interpublic.com

Interpublic (NYSE: IPG) is a values-based, data-fueled, and creatively-driven provider of marketing solutions. Home to some of the world’s best-known and most innovative communications specialists, IPG global brands include Acxiom, Craft, FCB, FutureBrand, Golin, Initiative, IPG Health, IPG Mediabrands, Jack Morton, KINESSO, MAGNA, McCann, Mediahub, Momentum, MRM, MullenLowe Global, Octagon, UM, Weber Shandwick and more. IPG is an S&P 500 company with total revenue of $10.7 billion in 2024.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 15,245
Subsidiaries: 36
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Clinic

20-24 Broadwick St, Soho, London, GB, W1F 8HT
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.clinic.co.uk

Clinic is an independent creative agency. We create bold ideas, and craft them beautifully, to get people thinking, believing and doing. All of our experience goes into what we do today, and although our world’s constantly changing, the endpoint is still people and their experience, no matter what the context or media. Born a Virgin company, the core principles of challenging the norm and putting people front and centre have served us well over the years. And they’ve served the many brands we’ve worked with even better. What does that mean in the real world? Launching products & services, increasing subscriber numbers, helping multi-faceted businesses feel human and showing brands how to be themselves. Whatever we’re doing, the core is understanding people and solving problems creatively. It’s what we’ve done for over 30 years, and it still drives us forward. We call it being something else.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 16,986
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ipg.jpeg
Interpublic Group (IPG)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clinic.jpeg
Clinic
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Interpublic Group (IPG)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Clinic
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Interpublic Group (IPG) in 2025.

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clinic in 2025.

Incident History — Interpublic Group (IPG) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Interpublic Group (IPG) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Clinic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clinic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ipg.jpeg
Interpublic Group (IPG)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clinic.jpeg
Clinic
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Interpublic Group (IPG) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Clinic company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Clinic company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Interpublic Group (IPG) company.

In the current year, Clinic company and Interpublic Group (IPG) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Clinic company nor Interpublic Group (IPG) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Clinic company nor Interpublic Group (IPG) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Clinic company nor Interpublic Group (IPG) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) company nor Clinic company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) nor Clinic holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Interpublic Group (IPG) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Clinic company.

Clinic company employs more people globally than Interpublic Group (IPG) company, reflecting its scale as a Advertising Services.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) nor Clinic holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) nor Clinic holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) nor Clinic holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) nor Clinic holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) nor Clinic holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Interpublic Group (IPG) nor Clinic holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References