Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

IPG Photonics (UK) LtdIPG Photonics (UK) Ltd
VS
TE ConnectivityTE Connectivity
IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd

IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd

2 Viggen Way, Coventry, England, CV7 9RE, GB

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile
744/1000Moderate

IPG Photonics Corp are the world leading manufacturer of fiber lasers and amplifiers. Since 2006 IPG have been listed on the NASDAQ under the ticker IPGP. IPG manufacture fiber laser based sources and systems that are widely adopted in materials processing, medical, te...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:4
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TE Connectivity

TE Connectivity

Galway, IE

Last Update: 23/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.te.com
811/1000Good

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) is a global industrial technology leader creating a safer, sustainable, productive and connected future. As a trusted innovation partner, our broad range of connectivity and sensor solutions enable the distribution of power, signal and da...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:42,188
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd

IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TE Connectivity

TE Connectivity

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TE Connectivity in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TE Connectivity (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TE Connectivity cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd

IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TE Connectivity

TE Connectivity

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd company and TE Connectivity company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd company and TE Connectivity company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd company and TE Connectivity company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd company and TE Connectivity company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd company and TE Connectivity company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd company and TE Connectivity company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd company and TE Connectivity company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd company and TE Connectivity company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd company and TE Connectivity company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd company and TE Connectivity company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd company and TE Connectivity company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd and TE Connectivity, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd and TE Connectivity, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd or TE Connectivity ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd or TE Connectivity ?
Between IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd and TE Connectivity, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between IPG Photonics (UK) Ltd and TE Connectivity, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA