Comparison Overview
IPCHILE

IPCHILE
República 285, Santiago, CL
Last Update: 28/02/2026
Somos un Instituto Profesional que nace en el año 2003 con el desafío de entregar Educación Superior de calidad, siendo avalada con 4 años de acreditación Institucional. Contamos con 4 sedes presenciales, ubicadas en Santiago, Rancagua, La Serena, Temuco y nuestro Ca...

Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje (SENA)
CL 57 8 69, Bogota, 110231330, CO
Last Update: 02/04/2026
El Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje, SENA, es un establecimiento público del orden nacional con personería jurídica, patrimonio propio e independiente y autonomía administrativa. Adscrito al Ministerio del Trabajo de Colombia, ofrece formación gratuita a millones de co...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

IPCHILE







Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje (SENA)






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for IPCHILE in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje (SENA) in 2026.
Incident History - IPCHILE (X = Date, Y = Severity)
IPCHILE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje (SENA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje (SENA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

IPCHILE

Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje (SENA)
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.