Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

IPC Shopping CentreIPC Shopping Centre
VS
Majid Al FuttaimMajid Al Futtaim
IPC Shopping Centre

IPC Shopping Centre

2 Jalan PJU 7/2, Petaling Jaya, 47810, MY

Last Update: 29/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ipc.com.my/
767/1000Fair

Open in December 2003, IPC Shopping Centre is Malaysia’s first shopping centre anchored by IKEA. Located in Damansara, it is the first of five meeting places within Ikano Centres shopping centre portfolio, serving as a community hub and shopping destination for those li...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:37
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Majid Al Futtaim

Majid Al Futtaim

Majid Al Futtaim Tower 1, Dubai, AE

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
829/1000Good

Founded in 1992, Majid Al Futtaim is an Emirati-owned, diversified lifestyle conglomerate operating across the Middle East, Africa and Asia. The Group started from one man’s vision to transform the face of shopping, entertainment, and leisure to ‘Create Great Moments Fo...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:26,580
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
IPC Shopping Centre

IPC Shopping Centre

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Majid Al Futtaim

Majid Al Futtaim

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IPC Shopping Centre in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Majid Al Futtaim in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - IPC Shopping Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IPC Shopping Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Majid Al Futtaim (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Majid Al Futtaim cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
IPC Shopping Centre

IPC Shopping Centre

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Majid Al Futtaim

Majid Al Futtaim

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between IPC Shopping Centre company and Majid Al Futtaim company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between IPC Shopping Centre company and Majid Al Futtaim company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between IPC Shopping Centre company and Majid Al Futtaim company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between IPC Shopping Centre company and Majid Al Futtaim company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between IPC Shopping Centre company and Majid Al Futtaim company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between IPC Shopping Centre company and Majid Al Futtaim company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between IPC Shopping Centre company and Majid Al Futtaim company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between IPC Shopping Centre company and Majid Al Futtaim company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between IPC Shopping Centre company and Majid Al Futtaim company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between IPC Shopping Centre company and Majid Al Futtaim company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between IPC Shopping Centre company and Majid Al Futtaim company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between IPC Shopping Centre and Majid Al Futtaim, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between IPC Shopping Centre and Majid Al Futtaim, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - IPC Shopping Centre or Majid Al Futtaim ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - IPC Shopping Centre or Majid Al Futtaim ?
Between IPC Shopping Centre and Majid Al Futtaim, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between IPC Shopping Centre and Majid Al Futtaim, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2