Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA)Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA)
VS
Land NiedersachsenLand Niedersachsen
Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA)

Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA)

undefined, London, undefined, SW1A 2HQ, GB

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile

The IPA is the government’s centre of expertise for infrastructure and major projects, part of the Cabinet Office and HM Treasury. We support the successful delivery of all types of infrastructure and major projects; ranging from railways, schools, hospitals and housi...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:197
Subsidiaries:69
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Land Niedersachsen

Land Niedersachsen

Hannover, 30159, DE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
778/1000Fair

Der Arbeitgeber Niedersachsen vereint über 2000 Dienststellen mit einem gemeinsamen Ziel: Wir gestalten das Leben in Niedersachsen verantwortungsvoll und zukunftsorientiert. Als der größte Arbeitgeber im Land Niedersachsen bieten wir sichere Arbeitsplätze, sinnstiften...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:21,736
Subsidiaries:37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA)

Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Land Niedersachsen

Land Niedersachsen

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Land Niedersachsen in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Land Niedersachsen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Land Niedersachsen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA)

Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Land Niedersachsen

Land Niedersachsen

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) company and Land Niedersachsen company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) company and Land Niedersachsen company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) company and Land Niedersachsen company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) company and Land Niedersachsen company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) company and Land Niedersachsen company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) company and Land Niedersachsen company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) company and Land Niedersachsen company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) company and Land Niedersachsen company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) company and Land Niedersachsen company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) company and Land Niedersachsen company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) company and Land Niedersachsen company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) and Land Niedersachsen, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) and Land Niedersachsen, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) or Land Niedersachsen ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) or Land Niedersachsen ?
Between Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) and Land Niedersachsen, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) and Land Niedersachsen, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA