Comparison Overview
ip Technologies

ip Technologies
kra 7 No 156-10 oficina 1707, Bogotá, Bogotá, 111171, CO
Last Update: 02/04/2026
IP TECHNOLOGIES con Nit: 900.245.045-8 es una compañía que inicia sus actividades comerciales en el 6 de octubre de 2008 con registro mercantil No: 01842436. Reuniendo la experiencia de más de 10 años de sus profesionales, concentra sus esfuerzos hacia la solución in...

CACI International Inc
12021 Sunset Hills Rd, Reston, 20190, US
Last Update: 30/03/2026
At CACI International Inc (NYSE: CACI), our 25,000 talented and dynamic employees are ever vigilant in delivering distinctive expertise and technology to meet our customers’ greatest challenges in national security. We are a company of good character, relentless innovat...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ip Technologies







CACI International Inc






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ip Technologies in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CACI International Inc in 2026.
Incident History - ip Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ip Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - CACI International Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CACI International Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ip Technologies

CACI International Inc
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.