Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

iOttie Inc.iOttie Inc.
VS
Kimberly-ClarkKimberly-Clark
iOttie Inc.

iOttie Inc.

Midtown, None, New York, New York, US, None

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.iottie.com
718/1000Moderate

Based in the busy city of New York, iOttie was founded in 2010 and has since become a thriving company within the electronics industry. Our team strives to produce products that are innovative, creative and unique while maintaining high quality. Since 2010, we have bee...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:36
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Kimberly-Clark

Kimberly-Clark

351 Phelps Dr, Irving, TX, US, 75038

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://linktr.ee/WeAreKC
805/1000Good

At Kimberly-Clark, everything we do begins with care — for people, for communities, and for the planet we share. For more than 150 years, our brands have created essentials that make life better for billions of people every day. Better Care for a Better World is more th...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:34,955
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
iOttie Inc.

iOttie Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Kimberly-Clark

Kimberly-Clark

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for iOttie Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kimberly-Clark in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - iOttie Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

iOttie Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Kimberly-Clark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kimberly-Clark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
iOttie Inc.

iOttie Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
IOT904072725
Kimberly-Clark

Kimberly-Clark

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
KIM859072625

FAQ

Between iOttie Inc. company and Kimberly-Clark company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between iOttie Inc. company and Kimberly-Clark company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between iOttie Inc. company and Kimberly-Clark company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between iOttie Inc. company and Kimberly-Clark company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between iOttie Inc. company and Kimberly-Clark company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between iOttie Inc. company and Kimberly-Clark company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between iOttie Inc. company and Kimberly-Clark company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between iOttie Inc. company and Kimberly-Clark company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between iOttie Inc. company and Kimberly-Clark company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between iOttie Inc. company and Kimberly-Clark company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between iOttie Inc. company and Kimberly-Clark company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between iOttie Inc. and Kimberly-Clark, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between iOttie Inc. and Kimberly-Clark, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - iOttie Inc. or Kimberly-Clark ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - iOttie Inc. or Kimberly-Clark ?
Between iOttie Inc. and Kimberly-Clark, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between iOttie Inc. and Kimberly-Clark, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA