Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

IOM - Labour MobilityIOM - Labour Mobility
VS
#ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept.#ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept.
IOM - Labour Mobility

IOM - Labour Mobility

Geneva, CH

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

IOM, through its Labour Mobility Team, enhances the benefits of labour migration by offering policy advice and advocacy, promoting safe practices and supporting practical and operational solutions to migration and integration. IOM engages across the labour migration pro...

NAICS:92812
NAICS Definition:International Affairs
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
#ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept.

#ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept.

2200 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20520, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://alumni.state.gov
756/1000Fair

Welcome, exchange program alumni! We are Alumni Affairs, an office in the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) at the U.S. Department of State. We welcome alumni of all U.S. government exchange programs, from Fulbright to Gilman, IVLP, YALI, YSEALI, YLAI, a...

NAICS:92812
NAICS Definition:International Affairs
Employees:10,001
Subsidiaries:75
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
IOM - Labour Mobility

IOM - Labour Mobility

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
#ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept.

#ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IOM - Labour Mobility in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for #ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - IOM - Labour Mobility (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IOM - Labour Mobility cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - #ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

#ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
IOM - Labour Mobility

IOM - Labour Mobility

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
#ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept.

#ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between IOM - Labour Mobility company and #ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between IOM - Labour Mobility company and #ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between IOM - Labour Mobility company and #ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between IOM - Labour Mobility company and #ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between IOM - Labour Mobility company and #ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between IOM - Labour Mobility company and #ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between IOM - Labour Mobility company and #ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between IOM - Labour Mobility company and #ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between IOM - Labour Mobility company and #ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between IOM - Labour Mobility company and #ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between IOM - Labour Mobility company and #ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between IOM - Labour Mobility and #ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between IOM - Labour Mobility and #ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - IOM - Labour Mobility or #ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - IOM - Labour Mobility or #ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept. ?
Between IOM - Labour Mobility and #ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between IOM - Labour Mobility and #ExchangeAlumni - Alumni Affairs - State Dept., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1