Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所
VS
USAIDUSAID
国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所

国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所

東京, JP

Last Update: 13/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://japan.iom.int/
751/1000Fair

国際移住機関(国連IOM)は、「正規のルートを通して、人としての権利と尊厳を保障する形で行われる人の移動は、移民と社会の双方に利益をもたらす」 という基本理念に基づき、移民個人への直接支援から関係国への技術支援、移住問題に関する地域協力の促進、移住に関する調査研究などを通じて、移住にまつわる課題の解決に努めています。

NAICS:92812
NAICS Definition:International Affairs
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:65
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
USAID

USAID

1300 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, District of Columbia, US, 20004

Last Update: 30/08/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.usaid.gov
778/1000Fair

USAID is the lead U.S. Government agency that works to end extreme global poverty and enable resilient, democratic societies to realize their potential. U.S. foreign assistance has always had the twofold purpose of furthering America's interests while improving lives...

NAICS:92812
NAICS Definition:International Affairs
Employees:19,620
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所

国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
USAID

USAID

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for USAID in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - USAID (X = Date, Y = Severity)

USAID cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所

国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
USAID

USAID

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
USA000021225

FAQ

Between 国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所 company and USAID company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所 company and USAID company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所 company and USAID company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所 company and USAID company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所 company and USAID company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所 company and USAID company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所 company and USAID company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所 company and USAID company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所 company and USAID company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所 company and USAID company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所 company and USAID company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所 and USAID, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所 and USAID, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所 or USAID ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所 or USAID ?
Between 国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所 and USAID, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 国際移住機関(国連IOM)駐日事務所 and USAID, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA