Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

IOM GeorgiaIOM Georgia
VS
UNHCR, the UN Refugee AgencyUNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency
IOM Georgia

IOM Georgia

12 Tengiz Abuladze Street, 1st Lane, Tbilisi, 0162, GE

Last Update: 21/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://georgia.iom.int/
751/1000Fair

IOM has a presence in Georgia since 1993, providing a comprehensive response to the humanitarian needs of migrants, internally displaced persons, returnees, and host communities throughout the country. IOM has worked on various migration-related priority areas over the...

NAICS:92812
NAICS Definition:International Affairs
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:70
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

94, rue de Montbrillant, Geneva, 1202, CH

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://unh.cr/6724adac9
808/1000Good

UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, is a global organisation dedicated to saving lives, protecting rights and building a better future for people forced to flee their homes because of conflict and persecution. We lead international action to protect refugees, forcibly displa...

NAICS:92812
NAICS Definition:International Affairs
Employees:20,552
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
IOM Georgia

IOM Georgia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IOM Georgia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - IOM Georgia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IOM Georgia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
IOM Georgia

IOM Georgia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between IOM Georgia company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between IOM Georgia company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between IOM Georgia company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between IOM Georgia company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between IOM Georgia company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between IOM Georgia company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between IOM Georgia company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between IOM Georgia company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between IOM Georgia company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between IOM Georgia company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between IOM Georgia company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between IOM Georgia and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between IOM Georgia and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - IOM Georgia or UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - IOM Georgia or UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency ?
Between IOM Georgia and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between IOM Georgia and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2