Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

IOM DataIOM Data
VS
World Health OrganizationWorld Health Organization
IOM Data

IOM Data

Taubenstr. 20-22, Berlin, DE, 10117

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://gmdac.iom.int
756/1000Fair

Data are key to inform migration governance, improve programming and promote a better public understanding of migration. Timely data on migration are often scarce, making it difficult for decision-makers to develop effective migration policies. Even when migration stat...

NAICS:92812
NAICS Definition:International Affairs
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:70
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
World Health Organization

World Health Organization

20, avenue Appia, Geneva 27, GE, CH, 1211

Last Update: 02/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.who.int
800/1000Good

The World Health Organization's mission: to promote health, keep the world safe, and serve the vulnerable. Working through offices in more than 150 countries, WHO staff work side by side with governments and other partners to ensure the highest attainable level of healt...

NAICS:92812
NAICS Definition:International Affairs
Employees:32,229
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
IOM Data

IOM Data

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
World Health Organization

World Health Organization

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IOM Data in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Avg (This Year)

World Health Organization has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - IOM Data (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IOM Data cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - World Health Organization (X = Date, Y = Severity)

World Health Organization cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
IOM Data

IOM Data

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
World Health Organization

World Health Organization

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
EXOWOR1788326823
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
WOR201411222
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
WOR903061925

FAQ

Between IOM Data company and World Health Organization company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between IOM Data company and World Health Organization company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between IOM Data company and World Health Organization company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between IOM Data company and World Health Organization company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between IOM Data company and World Health Organization company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between IOM Data company and World Health Organization company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between IOM Data company and World Health Organization company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between IOM Data company and World Health Organization company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between IOM Data company and World Health Organization company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between IOM Data company and World Health Organization company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between IOM Data company and World Health Organization company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between IOM Data and World Health Organization, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between IOM Data and World Health Organization, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - IOM Data or World Health Organization ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - IOM Data or World Health Organization ?
Between IOM Data and World Health Organization, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between IOM Data and World Health Organization, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-105761
SUMMARY

Dify is an open-source LLM app development platform. Prior to 1.16.0, the PUT /console/api/apps/<app_id>/server endpoint in api/controllers/console/app/mcp_server.py used AppMCPServerController.put() to retrieve an AppMCPServer by the client-supplied server ID without verifying that the server belonged to the requested application and tenant. An authenticated workspace member could therefore change another application's MCP server status and parameters, potentially redirecting data or disabling the service. This issue is fixed in version 1.16.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-105760
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, a caller can use the request-level media_io_kwargs field to select the GLMGA video backend and supply large values for the fps and max_frames options without a strict work ceiling. GLMGA constructs and deduplicates an attacker-sized pre-decode frame-index list, allowing a compact request and tiny valid video to consume disproportionate CPU time and memory in the shared media-loading executor. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105759
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, the Rust frontend's track_http_metrics middleware records the raw HTTP method token as a Prometheus label for requests reaching registered routes. An unauthenticated attacker can send unique arbitrary method tokens to unguarded routes such as /tokenize, causing Prometheus's Family::get_or_create function to permanently create counter and histogram label sets. Those label sets increase process memory usage and enlarge the /metrics response until the service or monitoring path is exhausted. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-105758
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. From 0.24.0 until 0.30.0, the Qwen2VLVideoBackend and Qwen3VLVideoBackend classes accept request-level values for the media_io_kwargs.video.max_frames and media_io_kwargs.video.fps fields without enforcing server-side ceilings. An unauthenticated caller can submit these values to the /tokenize endpoint, causing the sampler to decode every frame selected from attacker-controlled video input, consume disproportionate frontend memory, and potentially terminate the API process before scheduling or admission control. The Rust frontend is not affected because it rejects the media_io_kwargs field. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105757
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, structured-output request failures can escape request-scoped validation and reach the EngineCore fatal-error path. A per-request backend mismatch can re-raise a grammar compilation exception, padding produced by the ngram_gpu speculative-decoding mode can pass a negative token to guidance validation, and the Rust frontend can admit empty structured-output values that the Python frontend rejects, allowing ordinary constrained-generation requests to terminate the shared engine. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8