Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

IOM - COMPASSIOM - COMPASS
VS
UNHCR, the UN Refugee AgencyUNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency
IOM - COMPASS

IOM - COMPASS

17 Route des Morillons, Geneva, 1211 , CH

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.iom.int/compass
753/1000Fair

Launched in 2021, the Cooperation on Migration and Partnerships to Achieve Sustainable Solutions (COMPASS) programme is a multi-year, multi-region strategic cooperation between the International Organization for Migration (IOM) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the...

NAICS:92812
NAICS Definition:International Affairs
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:81
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

94, rue de Montbrillant, Geneva, 1202, CH

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://unh.cr/6724adac9
808/1000Good

UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, is a global organisation dedicated to saving lives, protecting rights and building a better future for people forced to flee their homes because of conflict and persecution. We lead international action to protect refugees, forcibly displa...

NAICS:92812
NAICS Definition:International Affairs
Employees:20,552
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
IOM - COMPASS

IOM - COMPASS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IOM - COMPASS in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - IOM - COMPASS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IOM - COMPASS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
IOM - COMPASS

IOM - COMPASS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between IOM - COMPASS company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between IOM - COMPASS company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between IOM - COMPASS company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between IOM - COMPASS company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between IOM - COMPASS company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between IOM - COMPASS company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between IOM - COMPASS company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between IOM - COMPASS company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between IOM - COMPASS company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between IOM - COMPASS company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between IOM - COMPASS company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between IOM - COMPASS and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between IOM - COMPASS and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - IOM - COMPASS or UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - IOM - COMPASS or UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency ?
Between IOM - COMPASS and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between IOM - COMPASS and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA