Comparison Overview
ioasys

ioasys
Av. Dr. Chucri Zaidan, 246, São Paulo, 04570-000, BR
Last Update: 16/02/2026
We are specialists in unique experiences for bold companies. Digital, but always with soul. For us, innovation, design and technology are just the means we use to bring the best of the digital universe to our customers and achieve solutions that will transform society. ...

Xiaomi Technology
No. 33 Xi erqi Middle Road, Haidian District, Beijing,100085,China, Beijing, CN
Last Update: 28/07/2026
Xiaomi Corporation was founded in April 2010 and listed on the Main Board of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on July 9, 2018 (1810.HK). Xiaomi is a consumer electronics and smart manufacturing company with smartphones and smart hardware connected by an IoT platform at its ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ioasys







Xiaomi Technology






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ioasys in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Xiaomi Technology has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - ioasys (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ioasys cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Xiaomi Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Xiaomi Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ioasys

Xiaomi Technology
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.