Comparison Overview
Invesis

Invesis
Regulierenring 35, Bunnik, Utrecht 3981 LA, NL
Last Update: 25/04/2026
Invesis transforms lives through sustainable infrastructure. We are a global investor and developer in infrastructure projects that create a lasting legacy for future generations. From transportation and social infrastructure to energy transition and digital infrastruct...

Odebrecht
Av. Luís Viana, 2841, Salvador, 41730-900, BR
Last Update: 18/09/2026
Founded in 1944, Odebrecht is a Brazilian group with diverse businesses and world-class standards of quality. Its Members, guided by the Group’s own philosophy, the Odebrecht Entrepreneurial Technology (TEO), provide services and manufacture products for clients on fiv...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Invesis







Odebrecht






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Invesis in 2026.
Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Odebrecht in 2026.
Incident History - Invesis (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Invesis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Odebrecht (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Odebrecht cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Invesis

Odebrecht
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.