What is the official website of Intrepid Museum ?

The official website of Intrepid Museum is http://intrepidmuseum.org.

What is Intrepid Museum's cybersecurity risk score?

Intrepid Museum has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 720 out of 1000, indicating a Moderate security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Intrepid Museum experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Intrepid Museum currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Intrepid Museum been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Intrepid Museum has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Intrepid Museum have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Intrepid Museum is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Intrepid Museum have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Intrepid Museum does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Intrepid Museum comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Intrepid Museum is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Intrepid Museum have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Intrepid Museum does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Intrepid Museum comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Intrepid Museum is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Intrepid Museum have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Intrepid Museum is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Intrepid Museum operate in ?

Intrepid Museum operates primarily in the Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos industry.

How many employees does Intrepid Museum have ?

Intrepid Museum employs approximately 242 people worldwide.

Does Intrepid Museum own any subsidiaries ?

Intrepid Museum presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Intrepid Museum have ?

Intrepid Museum's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 6,357 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Intrepid Museum ?

Intrepid Museum is classified under the NAICS code 712, which corresponds to Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions.

Does Intrepid Museum have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Intrepid Museum does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Intrepid Museum have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Intrepid Museum maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/intrepid-museum.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Intrepid Museum experienced ?

As of September 9, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Intrepid Museum has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Intrepid Museum have ?

Intrepid Museum has an estimated 2,262 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has Intrepid Museum faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

Intrepid Museum

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

720

/1000

Moderate

745

/1000

Moderate

Intrepid Museum Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

intrepidmuseum.org

Add Your Compliance Badge

The Intrepid Museum, a private non-profit, holds a special place in New York City’s cultural landscape. Founded in 1982 with the acquisition of the storied WWII aircraft carrier Intrepid—a National Historic Landmark and the centerpiece of its collection—the Museum welcomes over one million visitors annually from all around the world. Its mission is to promote the awareness and understanding of history, science and service through bold and immersive collections, exhibitions and programming in order to honor our heroes, educate the public and inspire future generations. The Intrepid Museum’s dynamic exhibitions exemplify the intersection of history and innovation. Immersive fun, STEM and history are showcased through technological marvels

Intrepid Museum

Intrepid Museum CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

Intrepid Museum

Breach

12/2023

INT105072425

Loading…

A.I.

Intrepid Museum Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for Intrepid Museum

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intrepid Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intrepid Museum in 2026.

Incident Types Intrepid Museum vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intrepid Museum in 2026.

Incident History - Intrepid Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Intrepid Museum Subsidiaries

Parent Company

Intrepid Museum

Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos

Website: http://intrepidmuseum.org

Company Size: 51-200 employees

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

Intrepid Museum Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

Intrepid Museum CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

May 04, 2017 07:00 AM

Watch: Trump speaks at the Intrepid Museum in New York City

President Donald Trump's speech comes after the House of Representatives passed a sweeping measure to repeal and replace Obamacare.

Read Article

October 11, 2012 07:00 AM

Panetta Warns of Dire Threat of Cyberattack on U.S. (Published 2012)

Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta warned that the United States was facing the possibility of a “cyber-Pearl Harbor” and was increasingly...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-86564

SUMMARY

A flaw was found in DPDK lib/vhost. Missing length validation before reading command_data in the virtio-net control-queue handler can cause an out-of-bounds read and a host process crash.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55250

SUMMARY

Maravel, a PHP framework oriented towards dependency injection, prior to version 10.74.0 has a high-severity Token Replay Vulnerability arising from a structural lifecycle mismatch between stateless token validation engines and high-performance relational caching layers. Any application with low cache memory that causes premature eviction to free up memory and applications running macropay-solutions/maravel-framework that utilize tymon/jwt-auth for API token authentication and blacklist management or any other package that does the same may be affected. This architectural risk might also impact native Laravel applications utilizing cache tags under specific volatile or eviction-capped environments. tymon/jwt-auth automatically probes for cache tag support. If found, it forcefully wraps 14-day token blacklist entries (jti) inside a relational tymon.jwt tag. In environments where the O(1) Atomic Lazy Eviction model is active — either natively inside Maravel-Framework v20.x or manually backported into v10.x via the explicit DI container singletons provided in PR #104 (App\Cache\TaggedCache and App\Cache\TagSet) — a strict global tracking ceiling (Container::TAGGED_CACHE_TTL_CAP_SECONDS) of 7,200 seconds (2 hours) is enforced to secure the system against memory index bloat. This ceiling forcefully truncates the 14-day blacklist lifespan down to a maximum of 2 hours, after which individual tracking keys naturally expire and disappear from the active cache window. Furthermore, because the optimized engine implements a generational version matrix to achieve O(1) flush speeds, any programmatic or manual invocation of a tag flush or reset (e.g., Cache::tags([...])->flush()) instantly bumps the internal atomic master version pointer. This shifts the computed cryptographic composite hash (sha1($this->tags->getNamespace())) for all overlapping components, rendering the entire existing index immediately unreachable. Consequently, through either natural 2-hour expiration or an intervening tag flush execution (like the cache naturally cleaning old values to free up memory), the invalidation state records are entirely wiped out. Because the tokens' physical cryptographic signatures remain structurally valid for up to 14 days, stolen, hijacked, or legitimately logged-out tokens are instantly and silently resurrected across the entire API gateway, leaving the application critically vulnerable to widespread Token Replay Attacks. Because this issue is caused by an upstream architectural assumption within the tymon/jwt-auth package rather than a core defect inside the framework, there is no direct framework version upgrade that can safely bypass this lifecycle collision without breaking business cache recycling bounds. Maravel version 10.74.0 introduced a way to backport the new fixed tagged cache from 20.x into 10.x by resolving TagSet and TaggedCache from DI, which is how this latent architectural lifecycle vulnerability was discovered. Users must apply the decoupled configuration workaround outlined below. As a workaround, make sure that cache memory size does not generate early natural evictions from cache to free up space, deleting blacklisted jwt ids before they expire. Applications must decouple flat authentication vectors from the relational tagging subsystem. This forces token identifiers to write directly to the primary cache keyspace as flat, un-tagged key-value pairs where they securely retain their unclipped 14-day lifecycle.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-53639

SUMMARY

Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6, the `GET /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{hash}` and `PUT /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{hash}` endpoints look up the payment request solely by the hash from the URL. No ownership check is performed against the authenticated customer or the underlying order. An attacker who obtains a payment request hash can read the payment request and, through the `payment` IRI in the response, recover the underlying order's `tokenValue` (which itself grants access to the full order, items, addresses, customer email, totals); and/or update the payment request payload (e.g. `target_path`, `after_path`). These fields are used by the front-end controller to redirect the user after the payment, so an attacker can flip them to an attacker-controlled URL and intercept the buyer. The hash is a UUID, so it has to be obtained out-of-band (logs, shared links, referrer headers, a co-located client), but once it is known no other credential is required, neither authentication nor knowledge of the order token. The creation endpoint `POST /api/v2/shop/orders/{tokenValue}/payment-requests` shares the same flaw: it resolves the target order solely from the `tokenValue` in the URL without verifying that the caller owns the order. The issue is fixed in versions 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6. As a workaround, add a query extension that filters the `GET` operation; decorate the `PUT` state provider, guard the `POST` creation endpoint with a command-bus middleware, and wire the services.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/Sylius/Sylius/security/advisories/GHSA-mr9r-h354-966r

CVE-2026-53638

SUMMARY

Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6, an authorization bypass vulnerability exists in the shop account API. The `PATCH /api/v2/shop/account/orders/{tokenValue}/payments/{paymentId}` endpoint, used by an authenticated shop customer to change the payment method of an order that has been placed but not yet paid (state `STATE_NEW`), does not validate that the chosen payment method is enabled for the order's channel. The equivalent checkout endpoint (`PATCH /api/v2/shop/orders/{tokenValue}/payments/{paymentId}`) correctly rejects out-of-channel payment methods with `HTTP 422`; the account endpoint silently accepts them and returns `HTTP 200`. An authenticated customer can therefore assign any globally enabled payment method to their own placed order, including methods that the store operator has explicitly excluded from that channel. The issue is fixed in versions: 2.0.18, 2.1.15, 2.2.6 and above. As a workaround, decorate the `Sylius\Bundle\ApiBundle\Changer\PaymentMethodChangerInterface` service in the application.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 4.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

https://github.com/Sylius/Sylius/security/advisories/GHSA-6955-hrm5-c4qp

CVE-2026-53637

SUMMARY

Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Versions 2.0.0 through 2.0.17, 2.1.0 through 2.1.14, and 2.2.0 through 2.2.5 contain an improper workflow enforcement vulnerability in the cart `FormComponent`. When an order is completed while its cart page remains open, the stale LiveComponent does not detect the order’s changed state and continues to permit cart actions, allowing an authenticated customer to modify or permanently delete an already completed order. Versions 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6 contain a patch. As a workaround, deployments can copy the patched `FormComponent` into the application's `src/` directory and override the `sylius_shop.twig.component.cart.form` service definition to use that class.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

https://github.com/Sylius/Sylius/security/advisories/GHSA-5597-7rmh-97q5

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Intrepid Museum Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

Intrepid Museum A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Intrepid Museum CyberSecurity News & History

Intrepid Museum Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for Intrepid Museum

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types Intrepid Museum vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - Intrepid Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intrepid Museum Subsidiaries

Parent Company

Intrepid Museum

Intrepid Museum Similar Companies

Intrepid Museum CyberSecurity News

Watch: Trump speaks at the Intrepid Museum in New York City

Panetta Warns of Dire Threat of Cyberattack on U.S. (Published 2012)

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo

Intrepid Museum CyberSecurity News & History

Intrepid Museum Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for Intrepid Museum

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types Intrepid Museum vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - Intrepid Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intrepid Museum Subsidiaries

Parent Company

Intrepid Museum

Intrepid Museum Similar Companies

Intrepid Museum CyberSecurity News

Watch: Trump speaks at the Intrepid Museum in New York City

Panetta Warns of Dire Threat of Cyberattack on U.S. (Published 2012)

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo