Comparison Overview
Intertek Transportation Technologies

Intertek Transportation Technologies
4700 Broadmoor Ave SE, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49512, US
Last Update: 14/11/2025
Intertek Total Quality Assurance expertise, delivered consistently with precision, pace and passion, enables our customers to power ahead safely. Our automotive, battery and energy storage, and related transportation industry testing and certification expertise is recog...

General Motors
100 Renaissance Center, Detroit, 48243, US
Last Update: 22/10/2026
General Motors’ vision is to create a world with Zero Crashes, Zero Emissions and Zero Congestion, and we have committed ourselves to leading the way toward this future. Today, we are in the midst of a transportation revolution, and we have the ambition, the talent and ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Intertek Transportation Technologies







General Motors






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Intertek Transportation Technologies in 2026.
Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
General Motors has 194.12% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Intertek Transportation Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Intertek Transportation Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - General Motors (X = Date, Y = Severity)
General Motors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Intertek Transportation Technologies

General Motors
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.
IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.
IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.
IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.
IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.