Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance GroupInterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group
VS
China Pacific Insurance CompanyChina Pacific Insurance Company
InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group

InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group

Carl-Bosch-Straße 5, Wiesbaden, 65203, DE

Last Update: 26/10/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.interrisk.de
752/1000Fair

Die beiden Unternehmen InterRisk Versicherungs-AG und InterRisk Lebensversicherungs-AG gehören zur Vienna Insurance Group. Die Vienna Insurance Group ist die führende Versicherungsgruppe in Österreich und eine der führenden Versicherungsgesellschaften in CEE. Die Ange...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:42
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
China Pacific Insurance Company

China Pacific Insurance Company

银城中路190号, 浦东新区, 200120, CN

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.cpic.com.cn/
811/1000Good

China Pacific Life Insurance Co., Ltd (CPIC Life in short) was formed on the basis of life insurance business of China Pacific Insurance Co., Ltd., which was founded on May 13th 1991, and is held by CPIC Group. The company was incorporated in November 11, 2001, headquar...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:24,963
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group

InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
China Pacific Insurance Company

China Pacific Insurance Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China Pacific Insurance Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - China Pacific Insurance Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China Pacific Insurance Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group

InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
China Pacific Insurance Company

China Pacific Insurance Company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group company and China Pacific Insurance Company company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group company and China Pacific Insurance Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group company and China Pacific Insurance Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group company and China Pacific Insurance Company company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group company and China Pacific Insurance Company company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group company and China Pacific Insurance Company company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group company and China Pacific Insurance Company company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group company and China Pacific Insurance Company company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group company and China Pacific Insurance Company company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group company and China Pacific Insurance Company company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group company and China Pacific Insurance Company company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group and China Pacific Insurance Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group and China Pacific Insurance Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group or China Pacific Insurance Company ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group or China Pacific Insurance Company ?
Between InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group and China Pacific Insurance Company, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between InterRisk Versicherungen - Vienna Insurance Group and China Pacific Insurance Company, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16197
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in Sipeed PicoClaw up to 0.2.9. The affected element is the function handleMessageReceive of the file pkg/channels/feishu/feishu_64.go of the component Group Message Handler. Such manipulation leads to missing authorization. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The reported GitHub issue was closed automatically due to inactivity.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-16196
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in Sipeed PicoClaw up to 0.2.9. Impacted is the function isPrivateOrRestrictedIP of the file pkg/tools/integration/web.go of the component web_fetch. This manipulation causes server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Patch name: 2efbe5d560e7ed9bc5209c203dc4aa6ecdbc7405. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-16195
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in Sipeed PicoClaw up to 0.2.9. This issue affects the function dispatchIncoming of the file pkg/channels/wecom/wecom.go of the component Group Message Handler. The manipulation results in incorrect authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The reported GitHub issue was closed automatically due to inactivity.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-10130
SUMMARY

QueryWeaver contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to obtain valid session tokens for existing accounts by submitting a signup request with a known victim email address. The signup route unconditionally creates and links a new token to the matching Identity via a Cypher MERGE operation before checking whether the email belongs to an existing account, causing the server to return a valid authenticated session token for the victim's identity without requiring any prior credentials or user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-16194
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in zhayujie CowAgent up to 2.1.1. This affects the function WebFetch.execute of the file agent/tools/web_fetch/web_fetch.py. Executing a manipulation of the argument url can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. Upgrading to version 2.1.2 is able to mitigate this issue. This patch is called ea47f3097eed4f8295c4cb3d76ecb97e0f43d632. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The vendor was contacted early, responded in a very professional manner and quickly released a fixed version of the affected product.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8