Comparison Overview
Interoptik AS

Interoptik AS
Eyvind Lychesvei 19 A, Sandvika, NO, 1300
Last Update: 07/02/2026
Interoptik er en av Norges ledende optikerkjeder. Vårt mål er å være verdens beste innen syn og øyehelse for våre kunder. Interoptik er en av Norges ledende optikerkjeder med 76 butikker over hele landet. Hos Interoptik møter du eksperter som tar ansvar for din øyehelse...

Shoppers Drug Mart
Toronto, CA
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Built on a foundation of professional expertise and personal service, Shoppers Drug Mart has been meeting Canadians' health care needs for 50 years. What was once a small pharmacy in Toronto has grown into an organization of over 1,200 stores from coast to coast, becom...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Interoptik AS







Shoppers Drug Mart






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Interoptik AS in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
Shoppers Drug Mart has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Interoptik AS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Interoptik AS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Shoppers Drug Mart (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Shoppers Drug Mart cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Interoptik AS

Shoppers Drug Mart
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security vulnerability has been detected in adafap api-mcp up to 92b9a5d04acfec165c7d4ef852496593aa87be06. This affects the function customAxios of the file app/api/proxy/route.ts of the component Proxy API Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. This product adopts a rolling release strategy to maintain continuous delivery. Therefore, version details for affected or updated releases cannot be specified. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A weakness has been identified in PhialsBasement KoboldCPP-MCP-Server 1.0.0. Affected by this issue is the function makeRequest of the file src/index.ts of the component BaseConfigSchema. Executing a manipulation of the argument apiUrl can lead to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A security flaw has been discovered in Handwriting-OCR handwriting-ocr-mcp-server 0.1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function fs.readFileSync of the file src/index.ts of the component upload_document. Performing a manipulation of the argument File results in path traversal. Attacking locally is a requirement. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A vulnerability was identified in Nikolaibibo claude-comfyui-mcp 1.0.0. Affected is the function copyFileSync of the file src/tools/utils.ts of the component comfy_upload_image. Such manipulation of the argument image_path leads to path traversal. An attack has to be approached locally. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in nltk/nltk versions 3.9.4 and the current develop branch. The `nltk.pathsec.validate_network_url()` function, intended to prevent SSRF by rejecting internal network addresses, fails to reject IPs in the RFC 6598 shared address space (`100.64.0.0/10`). This occurs because Python's `ipaddress` module does not classify such addresses as `is_private` or `is_global`, and the current guard only checks `is_private` and a few explicit categories. An attacker who can influence a URL passed to NLTK's network-loading helpers can exploit this vulnerability to make a strict-mode application send requests to shared-address-space hosts, potentially exposing non-public infrastructure reachable from the application host. The impact is limited to SSRF-style confidentiality exposure, with no code execution claimed.