ISC A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
ISC
Company Information
Website:https://www.isc.org/
Employees number:45
Number of followers:2,641
NAICS:513
Industry Type:Technology, Information and Internet
Homepage:isc.org
ISC Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
ISCTechnology, Information and Internet
Updated:
04/04/2026
04/04/2026
742/1000
Moderate
Ba
ISC Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
ISCTechnology, Information and Internet
Score locked

ISCModerate
Current Score
742Ba (MODERATE)
01000
3 incidents
-5 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
743
MAY 2026
742
APRIL 2026
742
MARCH 2026
747
Vulnerability
25 Mar 2026 • ISC
Internet Systems Consortium: ISC Issues Critical Warning Over Kea DHCP Vulnerability That Could Remotely Crash Services
Critical Kea DHCP Server Vulnerability Exposes Networks to DoS Attacks
742
CRITICAL-5
INT1774592629
Critical Kea DHCP Server Vulnerability Exposes Networks to DoS Attacks
The Internet Systems Consortium (ISC) has issued a high-severity security advisory for a stack overflow vulnerability (CVE-2026-3608) in its Kea DHCP server software, a widely used solution for IP address management in enterprise and ISP networks. Disclosed on March 25, 2026, the flaw carries a CVSS score of 7.5 and could allow unauthenticated remote attackers to crash critical network services, leading to a complete denial-of-service (DoS).
The vulnerability stems from improper handling of maliciously crafted messages sent via API sockets or High Availability (HA) listeners, triggering a stack overflow in multiple Kea daemons. Affected components include the control agent (kea-ctrl-agent), dynamic DNS updater (kea-dhcp-ddns), and both IPv4/IPv6 services (kea-dhcp4/kea-dhcp6). Exploitation results in an immediate DHCP service outage, preventing new devices from joining the network and disrupting lease renewals for existing clients.
Impacted versions include Kea 2.6.0–2.6.4 and 3.0.0–3.0.2. The flaw was discovered and reported by Ali Norouzi of Keysight. While no active exploits have been observed, the ISC urges administrators to upgrade to patched versions 2.6.5 or 3.0.3 immediately. For those unable to patch, securing API sockets with TLS mutual authentication (via `cert-required: true`) can mitigate the risk by blocking unauthenticated connections.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
IMPACT
REFERENCES
FEBRUARY 2026
746
JANUARY 2026
746
DECEMBER 2025
746
NOVEMBER 2025
746
OCTOBER 2025
745
SEPTEMBER 2025
745
AUGUST 2025
745
JULY 2025
744
JUNE 2025
766
Vulnerability
16 Jun 2025 • ISC
Internet Systems Consortium: BIND 9 Vulnerability Allows Attackers to Crash DNS Servers Using Malicious Records
Critical BIND 9 Vulnerability (CVE-2025-13878) Enables Remote DNS Server Crashes
744
LOW-22
INT1769088576
Critical BIND 9 Vulnerability (CVE-2025-13878) Enables Remote DNS Server Crashes
The Internet Systems Consortium (ISC) has disclosed a high-severity vulnerability in BIND 9, tracked as CVE-2025-13878, that allows remote attackers to crash DNS servers by sending malformed BRID (Boundary Router Identifier) and HHIT (Host Identity Tag) records. The flaw causes the named daemon to terminate unexpectedly, resulting in a denial-of-service (DoS) condition.
The vulnerability affects multiple BIND 9 release branches, including stable, development, and preview editions. Exploitation requires no authentication or special privileges, making it accessible to any attacker with network access. Both authoritative DNS servers and recursive resolvers are impacted, broadening the potential attack surface.
### Affected Versions & Patches
The following BIND 9 versions are vulnerable, with patched releases available:
| BIND Edition | Vulnerable Versions | Patched Version |
|------------------------|---------------------------------------|----------------------|
| BIND 9 Stable | 9.18.40 – 9.18.43 | 9.18.44 |
| BIND 9 Stable | 9.20.13 – 9.20.17 | 9.20.18 |
| BIND 9 Development | 9.21.12 – 9.21.16 | 9.21.17 |
| BIND 9 Preview | 9.18.40-S1 – 9.18.43-S1 | 9.18.44-S1 |
| BIND 9 Preview | 9.20.13-S1 – 9.20.17-S1 | 9.20.18-S1 |
### Technical Details
- CVE ID: CVE-2025-13878
- Severity: High (CVSS 7.5)
- Attack Vector: Network/Remote (no authentication required)
- Impact: Availability (DoS), no confidentiality or integrity risks
- Disclosure Date: January 21, 2026
The vulnerability was discovered by Vlatko Kosturjak of Marlink Cyber and responsibly disclosed to ISC. While no active exploits have been observed, the ease of exploitation and BIND’s widespread use make this a critical patching priority. ISC has released fixes, and no workarounds exist affected systems must be upgraded immediately.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
IMPACT
REFERENCES
Vulnerability
16 Jun 2025 • ISC
Internet Systems Consortium (ISC)
Critical DNS Cache Poisoning Vulnerability in BIND 9 (CVE-2025-40778)
744
CRITICAL-22
INT3932739102725
A critical DNS cache poisoning vulnerability (CVE-2025-40778, CVSS 8.6) was disclosed in BIND 9, the widely used DNS resolver software maintained by ISC. The flaw, stemming from improper handling of unsolicited DNS resource records, allows off-path attackers to inject forged entries into DNS caches without direct network access. Over 706,000 exposed BIND 9 instances worldwide are affected, including versions 9.11.0–9.16.50, 9.18.0–9.18.39, 9.20.0–9.20.13, and 9.21.0–9.21.12. While no active exploitation has been reported, a public proof-of-concept exploit on GitHub escalates risks, enabling attackers to redirect traffic to malicious destinations, facilitating phishing, data interception, or service disruptions. Poisoned caches could misroute clients for extended periods (hours/days), depending on TTL values. ISC urges immediate patching to versions 9.18.41, 9.20.15, or 9.21.14+, alongside mitigations like DNSSEC validation, recursion restrictions, and cache monitoring. Unpatched systems—especially high-traffic resolvers used by enterprises, ISPs, and governments—face severe exposure, risking widespread internet infrastructure compromise.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
IMPACT
REFERENCES
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for ISC ??
What was ISC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was ISC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was ISC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was ISC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was ISC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was ISC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was ISC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What was ISC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ??
What was ISC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ??
What was ISC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ??
What was ISC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on ISC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with ISC ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view ISC's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?