Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

IntermarchéIntermarché
VS
Chico's FAS, Inc.Chico's FAS, Inc.
Intermarché

Intermarché

21 allée des Mousquetaires, Bondoufle, 91078, FR

Last Update: 03/08/2026

View Profile
730/1000Moderate

Reconnue pour son combat contre la vie chère, Intermarché s'appuie sur un réseau de 2 328 points de vente en Europe (France, Belgique, Pologne, Portugal). Spécialiste des produits frais, l’enseigne propose différents formats de points de vente pour répondre aux attentes...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:50,024
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Chico's FAS, Inc.

Chico's FAS, Inc.

11215 Metro Parkway, Fort Myers, FL, US, 33966

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile

Our passion for fashion and desire to inspire confidence and joy have been guiding the creation of our women’s clothing, intimates, and accessories for more than 40 years. Our portfolio consists of three brands: Chico’s, WHBM, and Soma found in over 1,000 stores through...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:10,337
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Intermarché

Intermarché

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Chico's FAS, Inc.

Chico's FAS, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

Intermarché has 45.95% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chico's FAS, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Intermarché (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intermarché cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Chico's FAS, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chico's FAS, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Intermarché

Intermarché

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
INT1785795903
Chico's FAS, Inc.

Chico's FAS, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHI231072725

FAQ

Between Intermarché company and Chico's FAS, Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Intermarché company and Chico's FAS, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Intermarché company and Chico's FAS, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Intermarché company and Chico's FAS, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Intermarché company and Chico's FAS, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Intermarché company and Chico's FAS, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Intermarché company and Chico's FAS, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Intermarché company and Chico's FAS, Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Intermarché company and Chico's FAS, Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Intermarché company and Chico's FAS, Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Intermarché company and Chico's FAS, Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Intermarché and Chico's FAS, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Intermarché and Chico's FAS, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Intermarché or Chico's FAS, Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Intermarché or Chico's FAS, Inc. ?
Between Intermarché and Chico's FAS, Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Intermarché and Chico's FAS, Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-71194
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.2, the mDNS handler performs pool-blind lookups when resolving record queries and NOTIFY requests. When two zones with the same name exist across different pools, the lookup fails with a deterministic error, causing the handler to return REFUSED for all DNS queries through that path. The _handle_notify path is exploitable via a single unauthenticated UDP packet. This is independently reachable through the cross-tenant zone overlap described in a different recent CVE, and also affects legitimate same-tenant cross-pool configurations. BIND9 views do not mitigate this issue as mDNS is a shared service upstream of any view configuration.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-71193
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.1, zone creation checks (_is_subzone, _is_superzone, and the duplicate-zone DB constraint) are scoped to the target pool only. An authenticated user can bypass these checks by scheduling a zone to a different pool via the AttributeFilter scheduler, creating an overlapping zone that conflicts with another tenant's zone. This enables cross-tenant DNS hijack (redirecting traffic to attacker-controlled IPs) and DNS denial of service (NODATA responses). Exploitation requires a multi-pool deployment with AttributeFilter enabled in scheduler_filters, which is a non-default but documented and supported configuration for self-service tiering.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-49481
SUMMARY

UpSnap is a wake on lan web app. Versions prior to 5.4.0 have an OS command injection vulnerability in the UpSnap’s device management functionality due to the presence of unsafe shell command template interpolation using the ip and the mac fields. User-controlled values can be inserted into the wake_cmd and shutdown_cmd templates and executed via /bin/sh -c (Linux) or cmd /C (Windows) without sanitization, resulting in an authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE). A low-privileged user with permission to create or edit devices can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the UpSnap hosted server. Version 5.4.0 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-47718
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. When `secureEnabled=true`, FUXA `1.3.0-2773` still allows guest and invalid-token requests to read project, alarms, and scheduler APIs. Version 1.3.1 fixes this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47717
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. In fuxa-server version 1.3.0, the GET /api/project endpoint exposes sensitive project configuration data to guest-context requests even when secureEnabled is enabled. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9