Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Interlock Tech SolutionsInterlock Tech Solutions
VS
AmadeusAmadeus
Interlock Tech Solutions

Interlock Tech Solutions

1278 Justin Road, Lewisville, 75077, US

Last Update: 26/06/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://interlockts.com
647/1000Poor

Interlock Tech Solutions was founded in October of 2009 by Davin Brown & Heather Goolsby to provide highly efficient technology solutions to businesses. We have embodied several different business models since inception. Interlock started out as low voltage cabling an...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:3
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Amadeus

Amadeus

C/Salvador de Madariaga 1, Madrid, 28027, ES

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://amadeus.com
787/1000Fair

We make the experience of travel better for everyone, everywhere by inspiring innovation, partnerships and responsibility to people, places and planet. Our technology powers the travel and tourism industry. We inspire more connected ways of thinking, centered around ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:23,419
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Interlock Tech Solutions

Interlock Tech Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Amadeus

Amadeus

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Interlock Tech Solutions has 34.21% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amadeus in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Interlock Tech Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Interlock Tech Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Amadeus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amadeus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Interlock Tech Solutions

Interlock Tech Solutions

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
INTAKIBLA1782505527
Amadeus

Amadeus

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
AMA5502055092125

FAQ

Between Interlock Tech Solutions company and Amadeus company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Interlock Tech Solutions company and Amadeus company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Interlock Tech Solutions company and Amadeus company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Interlock Tech Solutions company and Amadeus company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Interlock Tech Solutions company and Amadeus company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Interlock Tech Solutions company and Amadeus company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Interlock Tech Solutions company and Amadeus company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Interlock Tech Solutions company and Amadeus company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Interlock Tech Solutions company and Amadeus company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Interlock Tech Solutions company and Amadeus company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Interlock Tech Solutions company and Amadeus company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Interlock Tech Solutions and Amadeus, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Interlock Tech Solutions and Amadeus, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Interlock Tech Solutions or Amadeus ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Interlock Tech Solutions or Amadeus ?
Between Interlock Tech Solutions and Amadeus, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Interlock Tech Solutions and Amadeus, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8