Comparison Overview
Interface Load Cells
Interface Load Cells
7418 E Helm Dr, Scottsdale, 85260, US
Last Update: 08/03/2026
World's leader in manufacturing precision load cells and force measurement technology. Since 1968, Interface has designed and manufactured more than 60 different types of standard load cells in a wide range of capacities. As the maker of the most accurate quality force ...
Johnson Controls
Milwaukee, Cork, Ireland, IE, T12 X8N6
Last Update: 25/09/2026
At Johnson Controls, we transform the environments where people live, work, learn and play. As the global leader in smart, healthy and sustainable buildings, our mission is to reimagine the performance of buildings to serve people, places and the planet. Building on ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Interface Load Cells
Johnson Controls
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Interface Load Cells in 2026.
Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Johnson Controls in 2026.
Incident History - Interface Load Cells (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Interface Load Cells cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Johnson Controls (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Johnson Controls cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Interface Load Cells
Johnson Controls
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.