Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Interface, Inc.Interface, Inc.
VS
WärtsiläWärtsilä
Interface, Inc.

Interface, Inc.

7401 E Butherus Dr, None, Scottsdale, AZ, US, 85260

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
716/1000Moderate

We are the trusted world leader in force measurement solutions by designing, manufacturing, and guaranteeing the highest quality performance load cells, torque transducers, multi-axis sensors, and related instrumentation available in the market today. Whether you are do...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:105
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Wärtsilä

Wärtsilä

Hiililaiturinkuja 2, Helsinki, 00180, FI

Last Update: 23/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.wartsila.com
787/1000Fair

We are a global leader in innovative technologies and services shaping the decarbonisation of marine and energy. With approximately 6.9 billion euros in sales and 18,000 employees across 78 countries, the Wärtsilä strategy focuses on helping customers to continuously im...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:16,349
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Interface, Inc.

Interface, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Wärtsilä

Wärtsilä

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Interface, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wärtsilä in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Interface, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Interface, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Wärtsilä (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wärtsilä cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Interface, Inc.

Interface, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
INT355071725
Wärtsilä

Wärtsilä

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Interface, Inc. company and Wärtsilä company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Interface, Inc. company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Interface, Inc. company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Interface, Inc. company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Interface, Inc. company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Interface, Inc. company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Interface, Inc. company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Interface, Inc. company and Wärtsilä company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Interface, Inc. company and Wärtsilä company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Interface, Inc. company and Wärtsilä company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Interface, Inc. company and Wärtsilä company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Interface, Inc. and Wärtsilä, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Interface, Inc. and Wärtsilä, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Interface, Inc. or Wärtsilä ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Interface, Inc. or Wärtsilä ?
Between Interface, Inc. and Wärtsilä, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Interface, Inc. and Wärtsilä, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9