Comparison Overview
Interacoustics UK

Interacoustics UK
Cadzow Industrial Estate, Hamilton, ML3 7QU, GB
Last Update: 27/02/2026
Interacoustics UK was established in 2011 to provide advice and support to healthcare professionals based in the UK. We are part of the Demant Group, one of the largest hearing healthcare providers in the world and we share our UK head office with Oticon, Oticon Medical...

Baxter International Inc.
1 Baxter Pkwy, Deerfield, 60015, US
Last Update: 14/09/2026
For nearly a century, we have delivered on our commitment to saving and sustaining the lives of patients, working alongside clinicians and providers around the world. We believe every person — regardless of who they are or where they are from — deserves a chance to live...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Interacoustics UK







Baxter International Inc.






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Interacoustics UK in 2026.
Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Baxter International Inc. has 1.96% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Interacoustics UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Interacoustics UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Baxter International Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Baxter International Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Interacoustics UK

Baxter International Inc.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.
Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.