Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Intel DeveloperIntel Developer
VS
ASMLASML
Intel Developer

Intel Developer

2200 Mission College Blvd, Santa Clara, California, US, 95054

Last Update: 26/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ai.intel.com
774/1000Fair

AI is rapidly evolving and transforming how we live today. Intel is your trusted partner in bringing AI everywhere with a comprehensive suite of CPUs, GPUs, AI accelerators, and a broad software portfolio designed to support you at every stage of your AI journey. From e...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ASML

ASML

De Run 6501, Veldhoven, 5504DR, NL

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.asml.com
821/1000Good

Who are we? ASML is an innovation leader in the global semiconductor industry. We make machines that chipmakers use to mass produce microchips. Founded in 1984 in the Netherlands with just a handful of employees, we’ve now grown to over 40,000 employees, 143 nationalit...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:35,826
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Intel Developer

Intel Developer

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ASML

ASML

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intel Developer in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

ASML has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Intel Developer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intel Developer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ASML (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ASML cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Intel Developer

Intel Developer

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ASML

ASML

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ODI1771093701

FAQ

Between Intel Developer company and ASML company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Intel Developer company and ASML company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Intel Developer company and ASML company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Intel Developer company and ASML company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Intel Developer company and ASML company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Intel Developer company and ASML company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Intel Developer company and ASML company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Intel Developer company and ASML company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Intel Developer company and ASML company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Intel Developer company and ASML company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Intel Developer company and ASML company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Intel Developer and ASML, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Intel Developer and ASML, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Intel Developer or ASML ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Intel Developer or ASML ?
Between Intel Developer and ASML, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Intel Developer and ASML, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA