Comparison Overview
Integrity360

Integrity360
Termini, 3 Arkle Rd, Sandyford, Sandyford Business Park, Termini, 3 Arkle Rd, Sandyford, Sandyford Business Park, Dublin 18, IE, D18 T6T7
Last Update: 08/10/2026
Integrity360 is a leading independent cyber security and PCI specialist operating across EMEA and North America, with offices spanning the UK and Ireland, Bulgaria, Italy, Sweden, Spain, Germany, Switzerland, France, Belgium, Lithuania, Ukraine, Africa, the Caribbean, a...

Orange Business
La Plaine Saint Denis, Paris, FR, 93457 Cedex
Last Update: 09/09/2026
At Orange Business, our ambition is to become the leading european Network and Digital Integrator by leveraging our proven expertise in next-generation connectivity solutions, the cloud and cybersecurity. Our 30,000 women and men are present in 65 countries, where ever...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Integrity360







Orange Business






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
Integrity360 has 31.97% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Orange Business in 2026.
Incident History - Integrity360 (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Integrity360 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Orange Business (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Orange Business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Integrity360

Orange Business
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.