Comparison Overview
Integrity360 Sweden
Integrity360 Sweden
Borgarfjordsgatan 18, Kista, Stockholm, SE, 164 74
Last Update: 09/10/2026
Integrity360 är Europas ledande expert på cybersäkerhet och PCI, med kontor i Storbritannien och Irland, Bulgarien, Italien, Sverige, Spanien, Tyskland, Schweiz, Frankrike, Litauen, Ukraina, Afrika och Karibien. Företaget driver sex Security Operations Centres (SOC) i D...
Algar Tech
Avenida Floriano Peixoto, Uberlândia, 38405-184, BR
Last Update: 02/10/2026
Somos a Algar Tech CX. Com 26 anos de mercado, atuamos como parceira de negócio para a transformação digital de grandes corporações. Nosso portfólio possui serviços de Relacionamento com o Cliente, que visam melhorar a experiência dos consumidores. Somos mais de 7 mil a...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Integrity360 Sweden
Algar Tech
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
Integrity360 Sweden has 32.43% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Algar Tech in 2026.
Incident History - Integrity360 Sweden (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Integrity360 Sweden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Algar Tech (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Algar Tech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Integrity360 Sweden
Algar Tech
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.