Comparison Overview
Integrated Security Corporation
Integrated Security Corporation
46755 Magellan Dr., Novi, Michigan, US, 48377
Last Update: 01/09/2026
Integrated Security Corporation (ISC) is dedicated to providing the most reliable perimeter protection systems available to protect your critical locations. Located in Michigan, USA near Detroit, we manufacture two different protection systems. Our wired solution is...
Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços
Avenida Professor Francisco Morato 525, São Paulo, 05513-000, BR
Last Update: 21/09/2026
One of the largest companies in the professional services and security markets in Brazil. Formed by four branches, patrimonial security, personal security, electronic security and general services. Counting with around 16.000 employees, Gocil is present at several brazi...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Integrated Security Corporation
Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)
Integrated Security Corporation has 27.54% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços in 2026.
Incident History - Integrated Security Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Integrated Security Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Integrated Security Corporation
Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.